Affixation as a type of term formation based on components Dialekt/Mundart
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2021_1_118
Abstract
The article deals with the main types of affixation as one of the leading mechanisms of term formation based on the components Dialekt / Mundart, which are the basic concepts of German dialectology. The main attention is paid to the identification of productive affixes, on the basis of which terms are able to form new terminological nests. The predominant use of affixes of Greek-Latin origin, as well as affixes of borrowed nouns and adjectives, allows to indicate the tendency for the further consolidation of the borrowed term Dialekt as the most commonly used
About the Authors
Inna V. Senina
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
83, Lemontov street, Irkutsk, 664074
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology
Svetlana Y. Pozdnyakova
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
83, Lemontov street, Irkutsk, 664074
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Pedagogy, associate professor
References
1. Arutyunova, T. S. Terminologicheskaya derivatsiya kak osnovnoy mekhanizm formirovaniya terminologii predmetnoy oblasti «sotsiologiya sem'i» na angliyskom yazyke (Terminological derivation as the main mechanism for the formation of the terminology of the subject area "family sociology" in English), Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Filologicheskiye nauk,. 2020, 3, pp. 76-83. (In Russian)
2. Vasil'yeva, N. V. Termin (Term) YAzykoznaniye. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. Moscow, Bol'shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya, 1998, pp. 508–509. (In Russian)
3. Grinov-Grinevich, S. V. Terminovedeniye (Terminology science). Moscow, Izdatel'skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2008, 304 p. (In Russian)
4. Merkur'yeva, V.B. Dialekt i literaturnyy yazyk v nemetskoyazychnykh dramakh (otnosheniya komplementarnosti i izomorfizma) (Dialect and literary language in German-language dramas (relationship of complementarity and isomorphism)). Irkutsk, izdatel'stvo IGLU, 2004, 346 p. (In Russian)
5. Senina, I. V. K voprosu o razgranichenii ponyatiy «termin» i «predtermin» (na materiale nemetskoy terminologii v oblasti dialektologii) (To the question of differentiation of the concepts “term” and “pre-term” (on material of the german terminology in the field of dialectology)), Credo Experto, 2019, 1, pp. 90-99. available at: http://ce.if-mstuca.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/senina.pdf (In Russian)
6. Stepanova, M. D. Slovoobrazovaniye sovremennogo nemetskogo yazyka. (Word formation of the modern German language). Moscow, Izdatel'stvo literatury na inostrannykh yazykakh, 1953, 376 p. (In Russian)
7. Zuyev, A.N., Molchanova I.D., Muryasov, R. Z., Slovar' slovoobrazovatel'nykh elementov nemetskogo yazyka (Dictionary of word-formation elements of the German language) Moscow, Rus. yaz., 2000, 536 p. (In Russian)
8. Denkler, M. Code-switching in Gesprächen münsterländischer Dialektsprecher. Zur Sprachvariation beim konversationellen Erzählen , Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Bd. 74, Heft 2+3., Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2007, pp. 164–195. (In German)
9. Diebner, B. J. Vorwort der Herausgeber, Mundart in der Kirche: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen; hrsg. von B. J. Diebner, H. Kröger, M. Mergel. Bd. 1. Berlin, Lit Verlag Dr. W. Hopf, 2014, pp. 1–5. (In German)
10. Elmentaler, M. Sprachlagenspektren im arealen Vergleich, Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Band 73, Heft 1. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2006. pp. 1–26. (In German)
11. Fleischer, W. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig, VEB Bibliographisches Institut, 1971. 327 P. (In German)
12. Goebl, H. Gebiete und Phänomene: Geolinguistik und Dialektologie, Quantitative Linguistik: ein internationales Handbuch. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG., 2005, P. 498–531. (In German)
13. Göschel, J. Strukturelle und instrumentalphonetische Untersuchungen zur gesprochenen Sprache. Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter, 1973, 327 P. (In German)
14. Grimm, J. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Bd. 1. Leipzig, Hirzel, 1880. 564 P. (In German)
15. Hertel, V. Einführung in die Dialektologie, 2014. available at: http://docplayer.org/14929043-Einfuehrung-in-die-dialektologie.html (In German)
16. Knoop, U. Das Interesse an den Mundarten und die Grundlegung der Dialektologie, Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung. Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1982. P. 1–23. (In German)
17. Neu, D. Ein Sprecher – mehrere Dialekte. Code-Mixing und Code-Switching im tridialektalen Raum um Dinkelsbühl. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. phil.) der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Katholischen Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. Eichstätt, 2014. 309 P. (In German)
18. Petré, P., Anthonissen, L. Individuality in complex systems: A constructionist approach, Cognitive Linguistics 2020, 31 (2). P. 185-212.
19. Schmeller, J. A. Die Mundarten Bayerns: grammatisch dargestellt. München, Thienemann, 1821. 568 P. (In German)
20. Schmeller, J. A. Ueber Quantität im bayrischen und einigen andern oberdeutschen Dialekten, verglichen mit der in der jetzigen und in der ältern hochdeutschen Schriftsprache, 1835. available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=ZUsAAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (In German)
21. Wrede, F. Deutsche Dialektgeographie. Marburg, N.G. Elwert’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1915. 89 P. (In German)
Review
For citations:
Senina I.V., Pozdnyakova S.Y. Affixation as a type of term formation based on components Dialekt/Mundart. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2021;(1):118-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2021_1_118
Views:
5
JATS XML
Email this article 