Invariant component of the content of higher education as a condition for the professional activities of future specialists in the infosphere

The article examines the invariant component of higher education as a condition for future professional activity in the modern infosphere. The authors conclude that in recent decades, the approach to developing higher education content has become less effective due to the rapid obsolescence of applied professional knowledge.  In this regard, the need to strengthen the invariant foundation of educational content, understood as a combination of fundamental scientific laws, methodological principles, and professional and ethical standards. The proposed model of higher education content includes an invariant component that enables future professionals to objectively verify data and critically analyze professional information from various sources. The аrticle presents the survey results on the significance of the invariant component of higher education content. In the view of the authors, the invariant component makes it possible to critically evaluate and verify information, thus endowing future specialists with professional subjectivity. The study’s results offer valuable insights for creating next-generation educational programs geared towards producing highly competent professionals ready to operate efficiently in the current infosphere environment

1. Barbashina E. V. (2018). The Need for Critical Thinking in the Context of Transformation. Professional Education in the Modern World. 8(2): 1777–1787. (in Russian)

2. Bermus A. G. (2024). Benefits and risks of using ChatGPT in higher education: a theoretical review. Pedagogy. Theoretical and Practical Issues. 9(8): 776-787. (in Russian)

3. Castells M., Kiseleva E. (2000). Russia and the Network Community. Analytical Study. The World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 9(1): 23-51. (in Russian)

4. Cherkashin, E. O. Ecology As Field Of Social Relations / E. O. Cherkashin, E. V. Titov // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), Moscow, Russia, 07–08 июня 2017 года. Vol. 28. – Moscow, Russia: Future Academy Future Academy, 2017. – P. 206-211. – DOI 10.15405/epsbs.2017.08.26. – EDN ZFKXUB (in Russian)

5. Floridi, L. The Philosophy of Information / L. Floridi // The Philosophy of Information, 2011. – P. 1-432. – DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001. – EDN YFAGSB.

6. Gapontseva M. G., Fedorov V. A., Gapontsev V. L. (2010). Evolution of the structure of educational content: monograph. Ekaterinburg: Publishing house of the Russian state prof.-ped. university. 154 р. (in Russian)

7. Konstantinova L. V., Vorozhikhin V. V., Petrov A. M. [et al.]. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence in education: discussions and forecasts. Open education. 27(2): 36-48. (in Russian)

8. Korneenko T. N. (2020). Promising trends in the development of the content of modern higher education. Domestic and foreign pedagogy. 1-1(65): 7-19. (in Russian)

9. Lednev V. S. (2014). Systems approach to pedagogy. Metaphysics. 4(14): 39-51. (in Russian)

10. Razov O. S. (2010). Information aspects of the evolution of the noosphere. Bulletin of Ivanovo State University. Series: Humanities. 2(10): 42-54. (in Russian)

11. Solovyov I. V. (2013). On the subject and object of the infosphere. Prospects for science and education. 5(5): 14-18. (in Russian)

12. Toffler A. (1980). The Third Wave: The Classic Study of Tomorrow. New York. William Morrow and Company, 1980. 544 p.

13. Ursul A. D. (1971). Information. Methodological aspects. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House, 1971. 295 р. (in Russian)

14. Ursul A. D. (1975). The Problem of Information in Modern Science. Philosophical Essays. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House, 1975. 288 р. (in Russian)

15. Ursul A. D. (2010). The Nature of Information: A Philosophical Essay. 2nd edition. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk Academy of Culture and Arts, 2010. 231 р. (in Russian)

16. Verbitsky A. A. (2009). Contextual learning: concept and content. Experiment and innovation in school. 4: 8-13. (in Russian)