The eurysemantic character of the German lexeme Sanktion in collocations
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2023_2_126
Abstract
This paper intends to analyze the use of a special type of phraseological unit – collocations formed by the lexeme Sanktion in plural and by a collocator in the modern German. For that purpose, some introductory remarks will first be given regarding the eurysemantic character and the origin of the lexeme Sanktion. Since this is a corpus-based study, details on the compilation of the digitized corpus will be outlined, and it will be shown which collocational potential Sanktion has developed in the German political discource. In the meaning of “veto, restriction” the lexeme acts as a part of collocations. Collocations have an asymmetrical syntactic structure: the basis in collocations is the lexeme Sanktion, the collocators are adjective and genitive attribute, prepositional groups, comparison words etc. The main task of the study is to examine the development of the collocation potential of Sanktion using examples from the modern German DWDS corpus, using the corpus parameter LogDice and the frequency measure. The combinations of frequency measure and LogDice allow to present collocations as formulaic patterns in political language.
About the Author
K. V. Manerova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kristina V. Manerova, Associate Professor, Candidate in Philology
Universitetskaya Emb., 7/9 Saint Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Belica C., Perkuhn R. (2015). Feste Wortgruppen/Phraseologie I: Kollokationen und syntagmatische Muster. In: Haß U., Storjohann P. (edd.). Das Wort und der Wortschatz. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. pp. 201-225.
2. Bock B., Manerova K. (2020). Reproduktion von Phrasemen im politischen Diskurs (am Beispiel von Zeitmetaphern während der Perestroika und in der deutschen Wendezeit). Nemeckaja filologija v Sankt-Peterburgskom Universitete, Vypusk IX: Dialogičeskoje vzaimodejstvije tekstov i diskursov [German Philology at St. Petersburg State University, Issue 9: The dialogic interaction of texts and discourses], pp. 245–266.
3. Bock B., Manerowa K. (2019). Das Fahnenphrasem Internationale Solidaritӓt in typischen Verwendungen – ein diatopischer und diachroner Vergleich. Sprachen, Literaturen und Kulturen im Kontakt : Beiträge der 25 Linguistik-und Literaturtage, Miskolc, 11–14.05. 2017 / Gesellschaft für Sprache und Sprachen (GeSuS) e. V. Miskolc: Verlag Dr. Kovač, pp. 41-52. EDN XTKXBA.
4. Burkhardt A. (1998). Deutsche Sprachgeschichte und politische Geschichte. Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung. Besch W., Betten A., Reichmann O., Sonderegger St. (edd.). Band 2,1. Teilband. 2. Aufl., Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp.98–122.
5. Dobrovol'skij, D., Piirainen, E. (2021). Figurative Language: Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, XVI, 487 р. DWDS.
6. Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. [Digital dictionary of the German language]. Available at: https://www.dwds.de (accessed 10.10.2022 - 29.10.2022)
7. Hausmann F.-J. (2004). Was sind eigentlich Kollokationen? Verbindungen mehr oder weniger fest / Steyer Kathrin, Herausgeberin. Walter de Gruyter.Berlin. New York, pp.309-334.
8. Manerova K. V. (2018). The dynamics of the lexeme Sanktionen as a key word for politically-legal restrictive discourse in German. Politichesakya lingvistika. 5(71): 81-89. DOI: 10.26170/pl18-05- 11. EDN YOCDTF. (In Russian)
9. Meľčuk I. A. (1998). Collocations and lexical functions. Phraseology. Theory, Analysis, and Applications / Anthony P. Cowie (ed.). Oxford, pp. 23–53.
10. Merten M.-L. (2020). Insights into a Changing Communal Constructicon. Legal Writing in the Late Middle Ages and Early Modern Period. Formulaic Language and New Data. Theoretical and Methodological Implications / Piirainen E., Filatkina N., Stumpf S., Pfeiffer Ch.(edd.). De Gruyter. Berlin/Boston, pp.225-248.
11. Palmer H. E. (1933). Second Interim Report on English Collocations, Submitted to the Tenth Annual Conference of English Teachers under the Auspices of the Institute for Research in English Teaching. Tokyo. 1933. 188 p.
12. Quasthoff U. (2011). Wörterbuch der Kollokationen im Deutschen. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin. New York. 2011. 551 p.
13. Steyer K. (2008). Kollokationen in deutschen Worterbüchern und in der deutschen Wörterbuchforschung. Lexicographica. 24. Internationales Jahrbuch für Lexikographie. Berlin u. a., pp. 185–208.
14. Teubert W. (2006). Korpuslinguistik, Hermeneutik und die soziale Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Linguistik Online 28, pp. 41–60. DOI:10.13092/lo.28.610 Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253043588_Korpuslinguistik_Hermeneutik_und_die_sozi ale_Konstruktion_der_Wirklichkeit (дата обращения 09.10.2022).
15. Zedler. Grosses vollständiges Universal-Lexicon aller Wissenschafften und Künste, welche bißhero durch menschlichen Verstand und Witz erfunden und verbesset worden [bearb. von Johann Heinrich Zedler]. - Halle u. Leipzig : Zedler (Waisenhaus). 1732 – 1750, Suppl. 1.1751 - 4.1754
Review
For citations:
Manerova K.V. The eurysemantic character of the German lexeme Sanktion in collocations. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2023;(2):126-134. https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2023_2_126
Views:
6
JATS XML
Email this article 