STRATEGY OF AUTHORIZATION IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATIVE DISCOURSE
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2023_1_195
Abstract
The article explores some methods of actualizing one of the legitimation strategies, namely, authorization, in the English language interpretative discourse. As an example of such a discourse the interpretation of the ancient Indian text “Bhagavad-gita” suggested by the translator and commentator is studied. The article features a number of categories used for authorization in this discourse and outlines methods of actualizing the authorization strategy: using modal operators and precedent names, metaphorization, analogy.
About the Authors
N. N. Kazydub
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda N. Kazydub, Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor
79, Svobodny avenue Krasnoyarsk, 660041
A. E. Bazarova
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia E. Bazarova
79, Svobodny avenue Krasnoyarsk, 660041
References
1. Boldyrev N. N. (2019). Cognitive dominants of linguistic interpretation [Kognitivnye dominanty yazykovoy interpretatsii]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 36: 43-53. (In Russian)
2. Demyankov V. Z. (1989). The effectivenesya]. Problemy effektivnosti rechevoy kommunikatsii. Moscow: INION AN USSR: 13-40. (In Russian)
3. House J. (2006). Text and context in translation. Journal of Pragmatics. 38: 338-358.
4. Karasik V. I. (2016). Discursive manifestation of personality [Diskursivnoye proyavlenie lichnosti]. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 20(4): 56-77. DOI 10.22363/2312-9182-2016-20-456-77. (In Russian)
5. Kazydub N. N. (2020). Axiological perspectivization as a tool of discourse construction [Aksiologicheskaya perspektivizatsija kak instrument diskursivnogo konstruirovaniya]. Vestnik KGPU im. V.P. Astafyeva. 4(54): 143-152. (In Russian)
6. KhosraviNik M. (2015). Macro and micro legitimation in discourse on Iran's nuclear programme: the case of Iranian national newspaper Kayhan. Discourse and Society. 26(1): 52-73.
7. Kolmogorova A. V., Kozachina A. V. (2020). Discursive strategies of legitimating institutionalized values in educational settings: experience of Japan. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 13(12): 1985-1994. DOI 10.17516/1997-1370-0698.
8. Kövecses Z. (2006). Language, Mind and Culture. Oxford. 2006. 397 p.
9. Kövecses Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics. 28(2): 321-347. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2016-0052.i.
10. Kubryakova E. S. (2004). Language and knowledge. On the way of understanding the language: parts of speech from the cognitive perspective. The role of language in understanding the world. [Yazyk i znanie. Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury. 2004. 555 p. (In Russian)
11. Lakoff G. (2004) Metafory kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by] / G. Lakoff, Johnson; translated from the English language by A. N. Baranov and A. V. Morozova; edited by A. N. Baranov; preface by A. N. Baranov. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 256 p. (In Russian)
12. Leeuwen T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 2008. 184 p.
13. Plotnikova S. N. (2014). Discourse construction as a theoretical concept [Diskursivnoe konstruirovanie kak teoreticheskoe ponyatie]. Izvestia VGSPU. Filologicheskie nauki [Bulletin of VGSPU. Philological sciences]. 5(90): 41-46. (In Russian)
14. Plotnikova S. N. (2015). Discursive technologies and their role in constructing the social world [Diskursivnye tehnologii i ih rol’ v konstruirovanii sotsial’nogo mira]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University]. 3(714): 72-83. (In Russian)
15. Sharandin A. L. (2017). Types of knowledge in the context of interpretation theory [Tipy znaniy v kontekste teorii interpretatsii]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics]. 3: 10-18. (In Russian)
16. Sidiropoulou M. (2013). Representation through translation: Shared maps of pragmatic meaning and the constructionist paradigm. Journal of Pragmatics. 53: 96-108.
17. Voronina O. Y., Gorshkova V. E., Kazydub N. N. [et al.]. (2021). Dynamics and statics in understanding the being of language: approaches, phenomena, methods of representation. [Dinamika i statika v poznanii real’nosti yazyka: podhody, fenomeny, sposoby reprezentatsii]. Irkutsk: ISU Publishing House. 2021. 285 p. (In Russian)
18. Yakoba I. A. (2018). Media discourse effectiveness: the gradation of power citerion [Effektivnost' mediynogo diskursa po kriteriyu gradatsii sil]. Teoriya yazyka i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya. El. nauch. zh. Kurskogo gos. universiteta [Theory of language and crosscultural communication. E. Sc. J. of Kursk State University]. 4(31): 216-225. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kazydub N.N., Bazarova A.E. STRATEGY OF AUTHORIZATION IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTERPRETATIVE DISCOURSE. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2023;(1):195-205. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2023_1_195
Views:
8
JATS XML
Email this article 