Categorical apparatus of social upbringing in educational and pedagogical literature

Educational literature, being essentially a teaching tool, is intended to form students’ representations of a particular field of scientific knowledge, including its categorical apparatus. The purpose of the article is to identify trends in the development of the categorical apparatus of social upbringing based on the analysis of educational and pedagogical literature covering the problems of social upbringing for the professional education of students. The educational literature on social upbringing is still limited and consists of twelve publications that are freely available. The first publication dates back to 2000. It is revealed that the holistic categorical apparatus in the published educational literature is based on the apparatus of the scientific school of A.V. Mudrik, which includes the main categories: individual pedagogical assistance, education, organization of social experience, educational organization, vital activity, organization and training of interaction, everyday life, socialization, social upbringing. This is due to its greater prevalence and universality. The categorical apparatus of social upbringing during the first quarter of the 21st century developed discretely, which was due to the historical nature of its development, which was due to the influence of the transformation of socio-cultural, political, and technological factors that influenced the sequence of changes and their meaningful characteristics.

1. Aksyutina Z. A. (2011). Pedagogical analysis of the category of social education. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 5(101): pp.162-166. (In Russian)

2. Aksyutina Z. A. (2023). Categorical and terminological apparatus of modern social education. Education and science. 25(3): pp.12-34. DOI 10.17853/1994-5639-2023-3-12-34. (In Russian)

3. Aksyutina Z. A. (2024). Key words in the formation of the categorical apparatus of social education. Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. Series: Psychological and pedagogical sciences. 21(4): pp.81-96. DOI 10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2024.4.6. (In Russian)

4. Brookfield S. (1993). Breaking the Code: Engaging Practitioners in Critical Analysis of Adult Educational Literature. Studies in the Education of Adults. 25(1): pp.64-91. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.1993.11730583.

5. Erlich V. A. (2024). Publication of Educational and Instructional Literature in the Priamur Educational District at the End of the 19th – Beginning of the 20th Century. Proceedings of the GPNTB SB RAS. 4(24): pp.36-44. DOI 10.20913/2618-7515-2024-4-36-44. (In Russian)

6. Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1977) [in 30 vols.]. Vol. 27. Ulyanovsk – Frankfurt / chief editor A. M. Prokhorov. 3rd edition. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1977. 624 p. (In Russian)

7. Gureev V. A., Beba D. N. (2023). Educational literature in mathematics for military educational institutions in the 18th century. Scientific Notes of Orel State University. 4(101): pp.268-271. DOI 10.33979/1998-2720-2023-101-4-268-271. (In Russian)

8. Karapetyan I. K. Trends in the Development of the Categorical-Conceptual Apparatus of Pedagogical Science in Russia (1850-1930): Abstract of a Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences (Pedagogical Sciences) Dissertation. Moscow, 2000. 32 p. (In Russian)

9. Kirsch A. (2018). Catechisms: socialist educational literature and the demarcation of religion and politics in the early 19th century. Religion. 48(1): pp.8-36. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2017.1340357.

10. Matyukhina N. S. (2023). Socio-pedagogical prerequisites for the creation of nationally oriented educational literature in Crimea in the 19th – early 20th centuries. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 79-1: pp.216-219. (In Russian)

11. McCauley R., Fitzgerald S., Lewandowski G., Murphy L., Simon B., Thomas L., Zander C. (2008). Debugging: a review of the literature from an educational perspective. Computer Science Education. 18(2): pp.67-92. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400802114581.

12. Pedagogical Encyclopedic Dictionary / Ed. B. M. Bim-Bad. Moscow: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 2009, 527 p. (In Russian)

13. Tang K.-Yu., Lin T.-Ch., Hsu Y.-Sh. (2024). Status and trends of socioscientific issues in educational literature: insights and extensions from a co-word analysis. International Journal of Science Education. 46(11): pp.1073-1097. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2272603.

14. Trubnikova L. I., Saveleva S. V., Valeeva I. Kh. (2024). Features of Educational Literature in a Military University. World of Science, Culture, Education. 2(105): pp.85-88. DOI 10.24412/1991-5497-2024-2105-85-88. (In Russian)

15. Zaretsky Yu. P. (2022). The first Russian printed textbooks. Issues of Education. 2: pp.140-154. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2022-2-140-154. (In Russian)