The image of the man in the mirror of binomial anthroponyms (lingua-philosophical aspect)
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2021_2_138
Abstract
The article is devoted to linguophilosophical analysis of anthroponyms imitating binomial nomenclature and created according to Latin model "homo + adjective". As our study has shown, in onomastics, Latin binomial anthroponyms are terra incognita, as they are not presented as a unified system. The reason lies in their dispersion in various fields of knowledge about man and their informative density. To solve this problem we have proposed a model based on three basic philosophical ideas about man (monism, dualism and trialism).
The analysis of the anthroponyms' binominal names has shown, first, that each of them implicitly contains features of one of the three basic philosophical systems; second, their informative density has two levels - lexical, where their dictionary meaning is represented, and philosophical, where they are expressed as expressions of certain world-views about human essence; Thirdly, they have logical and methodological connection and continuity, forming a unified open system, which reflects traditional and innovative ideas about homo sapiens in all its diversity
About the Author
Irina A. Nelaeva
Philosophy and Art History Department of Baikal State University, 11, Lenin street, Irkutsk, 64003
ANO «Irkutsk scientific and practical centre of medical and social rehabilitation», 11, Gorky St., Irkutsk, 664025
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Full PhD in Psychology,
PhD student,
director
References
1. Avgustin, bl. O svobode voli. Gl. IX [St. Augustine. On the free will, Chapter IX]. Onlayn biblioteka sayta Pravoslavie i mir. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://lib.pravmir.ru/library/readbook/29#part_150 [in Russian]
2. Bibliya. Knigi Svyashchennogo Pisaniya Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta. Sinodalnyy perevod (2010). [The Russian Synodal Bible]. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://prav-book.ru/books/view/1 [in Russian]
3. Bremer, D. (2010). Herausforderungen Gebrechlichkeit und Tod die Verdrängung einer Lebensrealität in der Gesundheitsgesellschaft des 20. Jahrhunderts. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://docplayer.org/26481143-Herausforderungen-gebrechlichkeit-und-tod-die-verdraengung-einer-lebensrealitaet-in-der-gesundheitsgesellschaft-des-20-jahrhunderts.html
4. Eliade, M. (1994). Svyashchennoe i mirskoe [The Sacred and the Profane]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU. [in Russian]
5. Elworthy, Ch. (1993). Homo Biologicus: An Evolutionary Model for the Human Sciences. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
6. Galvan, J. M. (2003). On Technoethics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine. 10 (4): 58–63.
7. Ganev, V. I. (2017). The spectre of Homo post-Sovieticus. news magazine „New Eastern Europe“. 19.10.2017. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://neweasterneurope.eu/2017/10/19/spectre-homo-post-sovieticus/#
8. Gitt, W. (1996). Faszination Mensch. Bielefeld: CLV.
9. Gritsanov, A. (Ed.). (2003). Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar [The Newest Dictionary of Philosophy]. Minsk: Knizhnyy Dom. [in Russian]
10. Harari, Y.N. (2015). Homo Deus: Краткая история будущего. [Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow]. Moscow: Izd-vo „Sindbad“. [in Russian]
11. Hinterhuber, H. (2001). Die Seele. Natur- und Kulturgeschichte von Psyche, Geist und Bewusstsein. Wien, New-York: Springer.
12. Il’ichev, L. (Ed.). (1983). Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Encyclopedic Dictionary of Philosophy]. Moscow: Sov. Entsiklopediya. [in Russian]
13. Kravchenko, A. (2021). Ot Homo Neanderthalensis k Homo Existentialis [From Homo Neanderthalensis to Homo Existentialis]. Sotsiologiya. 1: 11–21. [in Russian]
14. Lenin, V. (1968). Materializm i empiriokrititsizm [Materialism and Empirio-criticism]. Poln. sobr. soch., v 55 tt. T. 18. Moscow: Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury. [in Russian]
15. Llano Alonso, F.H. (2018). Homo excelsior. Los limites ético-jurídicos del transhumanismo. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
16. Marcel, G. (2010). Homo Viator: Introduction to a Metaphysic of Hope. Chicago: St. Augustines Press.
17. Men, A. (1990). Svet i zhizn. [Light and Life]. Bryussel: „Zhizn s Bogom“. [in Russian]
18. Nietzsche, F. (2002). Also sprach Zarathustra. Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen. Stuttgart: Reclam.
19. Plankensteiner, M. (1992). Homo cerebralisatus. Die Evolution des menschlichen Gehirns. Der Versuch eines Entwurfs. Essen: Verlag Die Blaue Eule.
20. Schmemann, A. Bogosluzhenie v sekulyarnyy vek [Worship in a Secular Age]. LitMir. Elektronnaya Biblioteka. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=115928 [in Russian]
21. Soyfer, V. (1993). Vlast i nauka. Istoriya razgroma kommunistami genetiki v SSSR [Power and science. The history of the communists’ defeat of genetics in the USSR]. Moscow: „Lazur“. [in Russian]
22. Tserkovnyy spravochnik i kratkiy slovar tserkovnoslavyanskogo yazyka [Church guidebook and concise dictionary of the Church Slavonic language]. WebCite. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://lell33.ucoz.ru/El_Books_Pravos/Church_reference_book.pdf [in Russian]
23. Velikanov, A. (2018 – 2019). Lektsii kursa „Homo mutabilis“ [„Homo mutabilis“ course lectures]. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://velikanov.ru/lecture18.asp [in Russian]
24. Warwick, K. (2016). Homo Technologicus: Threat or Opportunity? Philosophies. 1 (3): 199–208.
Review
For citations:
Nelaeva I.A. The image of the man in the mirror of binomial anthroponyms (lingua-philosophical aspect). Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2021;(2):138-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2021_2_138
Views:
4
JATS XML
Email this article 