The key aspects for MOOC design: foreign and domestic experience
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2022_4_183
Abstract
Massive open online courses have been gaining their popularity rapidly in the 21st century. Along with beneficial opportunities MOOCs have some drawbacks. The current paper focuses on the experience gained in relation to this issue and attempts to elicit the main aspects of an efficient MOOC design. In order to answer the problematic question raised in the paper there were used such methods as comparative analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, the study of advanced experience. Due to the chosen methods, the key aspects and steps for MOOC design were structured in a table. The researchers have described some of the challenges MOOC creators faced while launching their courses and the authors of the current work list possible solutions to the arising problems on the stage of MOOC design. The paper might interest scholars who study online courses and open education opportunities, MOOC creators as well as their providers
About the Authors
Olga A. Ivanovo (Kabanova)
Moscow City Teacher Training University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
postgraduate student and lecturer,
4, Vtoroy Selskohoziajstvenny proezd, Moscow, 129226
Tatiana N. Bokova
Moscow City Teacher Training University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doctor of pedagogic sciences, Professor,
4, Vtoroy Selskohoziajstvenny proezd, Moscow, 129226
References
1. Bazanova, E.M., Sokolova, E.E. (2017). Massive open online course on academic writing: management of students’ motivation to study. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2(209): 99-109. [in Russian]
2. Bessarabova, I.S., Bokova, T.N., Rychenkova, L.A. (2018). Goals and objectives of civic education in Russia and in the USA: The comparative analysis. Espacios. 39(38): 21-30.
3. Bonk, C.J., Lee, M.M., Reeves, T.C., Reynolds, T.H. (2015). MOOCs and open education around the world. New York and London, Routledge. 358 p.
4. Bonk, C., Zhu, M., Kim, M., Xu, S., Sabir, N. & Sari, A. (2018). Pushing toward a more personalized MOOC: exploring instructor selected activities, resources, and technologies for MOOC design and implementation. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 19(4): 91-115. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3439
5. Conole, G. (2015). Designing effective MOOCs. Educational Media International. 52(4): 239-252. DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2015.1125989
6. Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) Design, Delivery and Assessment. Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing: 208-213. DOI: 10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.37
7. Drake, J.R., O’Hara, M., Seeman, E. (2015). Five principles for MOOC design: with a case study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice. 14: 125-143.
8. Head, K. (2015). The single canon. MOOCs and academic colonization. In C.J. Bonk, M.M. Lee, T.C. Reeves, & T.H. Reynolds (Eds.). MOOCs and open education around the world. New York and London, Routledge: 12-20.
9. Jaggars, S.S., Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education. 95: 270–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
10. Jung, E., Kim, D., Yoon, M., Park, S.H., Oakley, B. (2018). The influence of instructional design on learner control, sense of achievement, and perceived effectiveness in a supersize MOOC course. Computers & Education. 128: 377-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.001.
11. Lee G., Keum, S., Kim, M., Choi, Y., Rha, I. (2016). A study on the development of a MOOC design model. Educational Technology International. 17(1): 1-37.
12. Kim, P., Chung, C. (2015). Creating a temporary spontaneous mini-ecosystem through a MOOC. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world. New York and London, Routledge: 157-168.
13. Krechetov, I., Romanenko, V. (2020). Implementing the adaptive learning techniques. Educational Studies. 2: 252-277. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-252-277
14. Onah, D.F., Sinclair, J., Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN14): 5825-5834. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2402.0009
15. Pluzhnikova, N.N., Korableva, E.V., Bokova, T.N. (2018). Intelligence and technology: The problem of interaction. Espacios. 39(38): 20-28.
16. Rogozhina, T.S. (2021). Methodology for creating an online educational course: from idea to implementation. Mir Nauki, Kul’tury, Obrazovaniia. 2(87): 90-93. [in Russian]
17. Severance, C. (2015). Learning about MOOCs by talking to students. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.). MOOCs and open education around the world. New York and London, Routledge: 169-179.
18. Shukor, N.A., Abdullah, Z. (2019). Using learning analytics to improve MOOC instructional design iJET. 14(24): 6-17. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12185
19. Sorokina, E., Gambeeva, Y., Glotova, A., Litvak, L. (2020). Factors affecting MOOC retention rates. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 196: 194-202. DOI: 10.33910/1992-6464-2020-196-194-202
20. Tareva, E.G., Tarev, B.V. (2018). The assessment of students’ professional communicative competence: New challenges and possible solutions. XLinguae. 11(2):758-783.
21. Titarenko, L., Little, C.B. (2021). An asynchronous university distance course as a possible model for international online collaboration. Universe of Russia. 1: 134-150. DOI:10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-1-134-150
22. Xing, W. (2018). Exploring the influences of MOOC design features on student performance and persistence. Distance Education. 40(1): 98-113. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553560
23. Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Wosnitza, M. (2014). What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies: 44-48. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2014.23
Review
For citations:
Ivanovo (Kabanova) O.A., Bokova T.N. The key aspects for MOOC design: foreign and domestic experience. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2022;(4):183-194. https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2022_4_183
Views:
18
JATS XML
Email this article 