Strategies for mastering the content of language education using digital technologies by students of technical universities

These days, in the context of international interaction in various spheres of economics, science, technology and cooperation, the issue of language education for students of technical universities is being actualized.

The subject of the paper is foreign language professionally oriented training, which involves the development of professionally significant skills and abilities, the formation of professional thinking allowing students to take into account the cultural and linguistic diversity of economic and technical systems.

The personality-development content of modern language education determines the emergence of various strategies for its acquisition. They are formed depending on students’ needs and capabilities. What is meant here is a strategy of staying in the content, a step-by-step strategy, a strategy of information exchange, etc.

In this case, these strategies are closely interconnected with one or another paradigm of education, for instance, the scientific-technocratic, humanitarian paradigm and the paradigm of tradition.

Digital technologies are not only a tool but also an environment for existence, which introduces new opportunities for mastering the content of language education: learning at any convenient time, continuous education, the ability to design individual educational routes.

In this regard, it is necessary to modernize the process of professional training, widely introduce digital tools for educational activities and integrate them into the educational environment.

Therefore, to ensure the effectiveness of the process it is necessary to determine each strategy that can be used to master language education with the help of digital technologies and identify the principles of learning that should be relied upon when using a particular strategy.

The implementation of the studied strategies in terms of new educational conditions will allow the teachers to integrate them within learning technologies. Using the strategies in an educational process will result in a qualitative breakthrough in the field of language education

1. Bailey T. R., Belfield C. R. (2019). The false dichotomy between academic learning & occupational skills. Daedalus. 148(4):164-178. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_01765.

2. Bettencourt G. M., George Mwangi C. A., Green K. L. et al. (2022). But, Do I Need a College Degree?: Understanding Perceptions of College and Career Readiness among Students Enrolled in a Career and Technical High School. Innov High Educ. 47:453-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09585-3.

3. Galskova N. D., Solovtsova E. D. (1991) K probleme soderzhaniya obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku na sovremennom etape razvitiya shkoly. Inostrannyye yazyki v shkole. 3: 31-35. (in Russian)

4. Gaynulina S. N. (2008). Gumanitarnaya paradigma v vospitanii. Upravleniye v sotsial'nykh i ekonomicheskikh sistemakh, 162-163. (in Russian)

5. Gez T. A., Starikova V. O. (2017). Sotsiologiya kak gumanitarnaya nauka i gumanisticheskiy kharakter produtsiruyemogo yeyu professional'nogo myshleniya. Nauchnoye soobshchestvo studentov XXI stoletiya 12(59): 82-88. (in Russian)

6. Glossary of Philosophical Terms of the Institute of Philosophy named Kirensky, https://1052.slovaronline.com/ (accessed 18.11.21)

7. Ibragimov I. A. Kriteriy «znaniye – pod deyatel'nost'» i model' otkrytogo obrazovaniya https://psycho.ru/library/3500 (accessed 19.12.21)

8. Isayev Ye. I. (1995). Osnovy psikhologicheskoy antropologii. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka. 384 p. (in Russian)

9. Ivin A. A., Nikiforovich A. L. (1998). Dictionary of logic. http:// www.terme.ru/dictionary/193/word/metod (accessed 13.10.21). (in Russian)

10. Kirichenko E. A. (2011). Methods of teaching students of a language university foreign language intercultural communication: on the material of cultural texts, 226 p. (in Russian)

11. Kolesnikova I. A. (1995). Pedagogicheskiye tsivilizatsii i ikh paradigm. Pedagogika. 6:84-89. (in Russian)

12. Kolesnikova I. A. (2001). Priroda gumanitarnogo znaniya i yego missiya v sovremennom obshchestve. Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye znaniya. 3: 33-46. (in Russian)

13. Komarova L. I. (2012). Klyuchevyye kontsepty nemetskoy kul'tury v soderzhanii obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku studentov-filologov. Aktual'nyye voprosy prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov, 232 p. (in Russian)

14. Konstantinovskiy D. L. (2006). Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoye obrazovaniye: oriyentatsii, praktiki, resursy sovershenstvovaniya, 264 p. (in Russian)

15. Liechty J. M., Keck AS., Sloane S. et al. (2022). Assessing Transdisciplinary Scholarly Development: A Longitudinal Mixed Method Graduate Program Evaluation. Innov High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09593-x.

16. Malakhov V. S., Filatov V. P. (1998). Modern Western Philosophy: A Dictionary, 544 p. (in Russian)

17. Matveeva E. Yu. Philosophy Brief thematic dictionary. 184 p. https://refdt.ru/docs/756/index-29621.html (accessed 18.11.21) (in Russian)

18. Monakhova L. Yu. (2014). Aktual'nyye issledovaniya realizatsii gumanitarnoy paradigmy v sovremennom obrazovanii. Chelovek i obrazovaniye. 1: 14-19. (in Russian)

19. Ozerova M. V. (2008). Obrazovatel'nyye strategii studentov vuzov: podkhody k issledovaniyu. Kul'tura, lichnost', obshchestvo v sovremennom mire: metodologiya, opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya. 3: 159-161. (in Russian)

20. Shapovalov V. F. (1994). Spetsifike gumanitarnogo znaniya (zametki na polyakh izvestnoy temy). Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost'. 1: 85-92. (in Russian)

21. Titova S. V. (2017). Tsifrovyye tekhnologii v yazykovom obuchenii: teoriya i praktika, 248 p. (in Russian)

22. Ulitsky H. (2000). Language Learner Strategies with Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 22 (3): 285-322. (in Russian)

23. Zimnyaya I. A. (2009). Klyuchevyye kompetentsii – novaya paradigma rezul'tata obrazovaniya. Eksperiment i innovatsii v shkole. 2: 7-13. (in Russian)