Preview

Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language

Advanced search

Selection and substantiation of parameters and performance indicators of the in- service inspection system of onboard aircraft equipment units

https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2022_4_70

Abstract

The in-service inspection (ISI) system of onboard equipment of civil aircraft provides management of technical operation processes. Its quality is manifested in the process of in-service inspection. The ISI involves determining the technical state of monitor objects at various stages of operation: in flight, during operational maintenance (pre-flight and post-flight check), during periodic maintenance, after removing the equipment from the aircraft. The analysis of the problem of forming and improving the ISI system for onboard equipment shows its complexity requiring a systematic approach based on the appropriate mathematical apparatus. The ISI is characterized by the inspection accuracy, i.e. a property of technical state inspection which determines the degree of display objectivity as a result of monitoring the actual technical state of a monitor object. As quantitative parameters and performance indicators of the ISI system for onboard equipment, the characteristics of the inspection accuracy serve. To determine them, rational sets of technical states and decisions about the technical states of onboard units were formed. Based on belonging to these sets, three groups of the inspection accuracy characteristics were identified. The first group consists of conditional probabilities of transitions in the in-service inspection for various types of control. The second group consists of unconditional probabilities of transitions in the in-service inspection for various types of control. The third group consists of a posteriori decision-making probabilities in the process of in-service inspection for various types of control. Analytical dependencies for calculating the inspection accuracy characteristics of the three groups for onboard units and the relationship between them were determined

About the Author

Sergey V. Kuznetsov
Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
Russian Federation

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor
20 Kronshtadtsky blvd, Moscow, 125993



References

1. Bogoyavlensky A. A. (2021). Methodology and practice of ensuring the uniformity of measurements in the operation of ground-based automated control systems for on-board equipment of aircraft. Scientific. Bulletin of the State Research Institute of Civil Aviation. 37: 31-41.

2. Chinyuchin Yu. M., Solovyov A. S. (2020). The use of Markov processes for the analysis and control of the operational manufacturability of the aircraft. Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation. V. 23. No. 1: 71-83

3. Fedosov E. A., Kosyanchuk V. V., Selvesyuk N. I. (2015). Integrated modular avionics. Radioelectronic technologies. 1: 66 – 71.

4. Karnov A. A., Zelenov S. V. (2017). Stochastic methods for analysis of complex hard-ware-software systems. Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of the RAS. V. 29. No. 4: 191-202.

5. Khairullin R. Z. (2022). Optimization of operation processes and updating of the measuring equipment fleet. Measuring technology. 8: 28-34.

6. Kulabukhov V. S. (2015). Federated-integrated distributed modular avionics. Aerospace instrumentation. 12: 11-31.

7. Kuznetsov S. V. (2021a). Operational control systems for on-board equipment of civil aviation aircraft. In the book: Civil aviation at the present stage of development of science, technology and society. Collection of abstracts of the International Scientific and Technical Conference dedicated to the 50th anniversary of MSTU GA. Moscow. 239-242.

8. Kuznetsov S. V. (2021b). The system of operational control of on-board equipment of civil aviation aircraft and the scientific basis for its formation. Scientific Bulletin of MSTU GA. Volume 24. No. 3: 31-41.

9. Levin S. F. (2018). The quality of verification of measuring instruments and a posteriori reliability of control. Measuring technology. 9: 20-25.

10. Maltsev G. N., Yakimov V. L. (2018). Reliability of multi-stage control of the technical condition of test objects. Information and control systems. 1 (92): 49-57.

11. Mezhenov A. V. (2020). Model for monitoring the technical condition of communications and radio engineering. Communication technology. 1 (149): 54-64.

12. Mishchenko V. I., Kravtsov A. N., Mamleev T. F. (2021). Semi-Markov model of the functioning of redundant measuring instruments, taking into account the frequency of verification. Measuring technology. 4: 22-27.

13. Musorin A. S., Polzik V. P. (2018). Automation of checklists on SSJ-100 aircraft. In the collection: Aviation of Russia: past, present, future. Materials of the II scientific-practical conference of the "Strela" branch of the MAI in the city of Zhukovsky, dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the establishment of TsAGI. 83-90.

14. Sartakov S. S. (2020). Analysis of methods and means of testing aircraft radio-electronic equipment. In the collection: Actual problems of radio electronics and telecommunications. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference. 206-207.

15. Sukhorukov V. A., Semenov N. M., Ryabinin A. L., Barmina S. V. (2019). Maintaining the airworthiness of on-board equipment of civil aviation aircraft during technical operation to failure with monitoring of the level of reliability. Scientific Bulletin of the State Research Institute of Civil Aviation. 29: 116-123


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsov S.V. Selection and substantiation of parameters and performance indicators of the in- service inspection system of onboard aircraft equipment units. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2022;(4):70-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2022_4_70

Views: 12

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2312-1327 (Online)