Current state and prospects for development of systems for planning airspace management. Part 1
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327-2025-1-86
Abstract
In the general air traffic management system, one of the main functions is performed by the airspace planning (ASP) subsystem, which carries out preliminary (strategic), daily (pre-tactical) and current (tactical) planning with the required quality indicators, the values of which depend on the location and tasks of the aerodrome.
The paper is the first part of the review of existing airspace planning systems. The purpose of the study is to review and comparatively analyze existing air traffic models. Currently, the following air situation models are known: network, probabilistic, load dynamics, expert, air situation development, potentials, entropy. The paper provides an overview of them, identifying their advantages and disadvantages. These models are used to predict air traffic intensity, calculate the shortest routes, form the order of departures and arrivals of aircraft. However, the increase in requirements for airspace capacity and the need to ensure a high level of air traffic safety, with restrictions on aircraft flight parameters, fuel consumption and other indicators of air traffic service quality creates a problematic situation, which, at present, has not been resolved in the existing airspace planning systems. The use of existing models in high-intensity air traffic leads to a significant increase in average fuel consumption, which is why they need to be improved.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Knyazhsky
JSC «Obukhov Plant»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Yu. Knyazhsky, Candidate of Technical Sciences
Obukhovskaya Oborony Avenue, 120, St. Petersburg, 192012, Russia
S. V. Baushev
JSC «Obukhov Plant»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Baushev, Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor
Obukhovskaya Oborony Avenue, 120, St. Petersburg, 192012, Russia
References
1. Ahmad-Beygi S., Cohn A, Weir M. (2009). An integer programming approach to generating airline crew pairings. Computers & Operations Research. 4(36): 1284-1298.
2. Antunes D., Vaze V., Antunes A.P. (2019). A robust pairing model for airline crew scheduling. Transportation Science. 6(53): 1751–1771.
3. Barnhart C., Boland N. L., Clarke L. W., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L., Shenoi R. G. (1998). Flight string models for aircraft fleeting and routing. Transportation Science. 3(32):208–220.
4. Barnhart C., Cohn A. (2004). Airline schedule planning: Accomplishments and opportunities. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 6(1): 3–22.
5. Barnhart C., Cohn A. M., Johnson E. L., Klabjan D., Nemhauser G. L., Vance P. H. (2003). Airline crew scheduling. Handbook of Transportation Science. 517–560.
6. Barnhart C., Shenoi R. G. (1998). An approximate model and solution approach for the long-haul crew pairing problem. Transportation Science. 32(3): 221–231.
7. Baushev S. V., Tkachenko T. L. (2021). On the development of expert systems as a tool to support decision-making by the manager. Radio navigation and time: works of the North-West Regional Center of the Almaz-Antey Air and Space Defense Concern. 7 (15): 24-52. (In Russian)
8. Belis M., Guiasu S. (1968). A quantitative-qualitative measure of information in cybernetic systems. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. (14): 593–594.
9. Bocharov P. P., Pechinkin A. V. (2005). Probability Theory. Mathematical Statistics. Moscow, 2005. 296 p. EDN MVAAZL. (In Russian)
10. Brinley D., Sh. Krishna. (2020). Rule-Based Data Quality Management of Flight Information. LS Technologies. 2020.
11. Chaimatanan S., Delahaye D., Mongeau M. A. (2014). Hybrid Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm for Strategic Planning of 4D Aircraft Trajectories at the Continental Scale. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine. 4(9): 46–61.
12. Chaimatanan S., Delahaye D., Mongeau M. A. (2015). Aircraft 4D Trajectories Planning under Uncertainties. Proceedings of 2015 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI 2015): 51–58.
13. Chekha V. A. (2004). Simulation model of daily air traffic planning. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Theory and control systems. (5): 100-104. (In Russian)
14. Daskin M. S., Panayotopoulos N. D. (1989). An Llagrangian relaxation approach to assigning aircraft to routes in hub and spoke networks. Transportation Science. 23(2): 91–99
15. Federal aviation regulations "Air traffic management in the Russian Federation". 2011. 121 p. (In Russian)
16. Golivtsova N. S., Budzinsky V. D. (2021). Justification of the Need for Competent Accounting of Meteorological Information When Planning and Performing Aircraft Flights. International Research Journal. 11-2 (113): 21-25. (In Russian)
17. Krivoruchko Yu.T., Korol V.M., Knyazhsky A.Yu., Shatrakov Yu.G. (2023). Promising directions of development of short-range radio engineering systems of navigation. Radio navigation and time: works of the North-West Regional Center of the Almaz-Antey Air and Space Defense Concern. 13 (21): 17-26. (In Russian)
18. Kulida E. L. Lebedev V. G. (2023). Methods for Solving Problems of Planning and Regulating Air Traffic Flows. Part 1. Strategic Planning of Four-Dimensional Trajectories. Problems of Management. (1): 3-14. (In Russian)
19. Pechenezhsky, V. K., Chuvikovskaya E. K. (2023). Features of the organization of airspace use planning in the Russian Federation on the example of the Moscow air zone. Scientific Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation. 26(6): 47-57. (In Russian)
20. Rebrov, V. A., Rudelson L. E., Chernikova M. A. (2007). Model of Collection and Processing of Flight Requests in the Problem of Flight Planning. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Control Theory and Systems. (3): 97-111. (In Russian)
21. Sovetov B. Ya., Sikerin A. V. (2016). Gravitational and entropy models of flows in territorial planning of transport system development. Bulletin of ETU LETI. (8): 21-25. (In Russian)
22. William D. (2022). Flight Object Management Capability: Foundation for Flight Information Management Strategy / 2022 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS). 1-7.
23. Wilson A. G. (1967). A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research. 1: 253–270.
24. Wilson A. G. (1969). Entropy maximizing models in the theory of trip distributions, mode split and route split. J. of Transportation and Economic Policy. 3: 108–126.
25. Zhe Liang, Chou Chun-An, Chaovalitwongse Wanpracha. (2020). Airline planning and scheduling: Models and solution methodologies. Frontiers of Engineering Management. 7(4): 1-26.
Review
For citations:
Knyazhsky A.Yu., Baushev S.V. Current state and prospects for development of systems for planning airspace management. Part 1. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2025;(1):86-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327-2025-1-86
Views:
6
JATS XML
Email this article 