Lecture-discussion in the system of the forms of organizing the educational process for prospective specialists: relevance, specificity, necessary conditions
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2025_2_165
Abstract
The article is devoted to identifying the didactic potential of the lecture-discussion and the conditions for its implementation in the practical activities of a university teacher. Based on the analysis of scientific literature, the main advantages of the lecture-discussion are determined, allowing to correct the shortcomings of a traditional monologue lecture without losing its genus characteristics. The results of a survey of teachers and students of Tula State University are presented, confirming the importance of the lecture-discussion for the development of critical thinking and cognitive independence of prospective specialists.
About the Authors
O. V. Zaslavskaya
Tula State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Zaslavskaya, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor
Lenin Prospect, 92 Tula, 300012
E. Yu. Fatyushina
Tula State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Yu. Fatyushina, Candidate of Philological Sciences
Lenin Prospect, 92 Tula, 300012
References
1. Artyukhina M. S., Artyukhin O. I. (2013). Theoretical and methodological foundations of conducting interactive lectures. Fundamental research. Pedagogical sciences. 11-2: 304-308. (In Russian)
2. Bloom B. S., Engelhart M. D., Furst E. J., Hill W. H., Krathwohl D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956.
3. Doroshenko N. K., Doroshenko V. A. (2010). Communication between teacher and student in the form of a lecture. Modern issues of theory and practice of teaching at the university: collection of scientific papers. 11: 43-48. (In Russian)
4. Fayzullaeva N. (2023). Heuristic learning as a means of development creative abilities of students. Slovak International Scientific Journal. 71: 39-42. (In Russian)
5. Halpern D. F., Dunn D. S. (2021). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (6th ed.). New York: Routledge, 2021.
6. Haxhiymeri V., Kristo F. (2014). Teaching through lectures and achieve active learning in higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 5 (19): 456-467.
7. Kaufman J. C., Sternberg, R. J. (2019). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology) (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
8. Kosyakova Ya. S., Osipov E. V. (2020). Lecture in the context of dialogue learning and competence-based approach to the construction of educational technologies: collection of conference papers. Society, pedagogy, psychology: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conf. Cheboksary: ID Sreda, 73-76. (In Russian)
9. Kryukova N. V., Makarenko G. I. (2020). Experience of using a heuristic lecture-discussion in the process of forming competencies within the framework of the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard. Problems of modern pedagogical education. 66-1: 119-123. (In Russian)
10. Kuzyoma T. B., Rudenko N. S. (2024). Oratory skills of a modern teacher in organizing a binary lecture and a lecture-discussion at a university. Modern Humanities Success. 3: 278-284. (In Russian)
11. Lenz P. H., McCallister J. W., Luks A. M., Le T. T. & Fessler H. E. (2015). Practical strategies for effective lectures. Seminars for Educators. 12 (4): 561-566.
12. Leontiev A. A. (1974). Lecture as communication. Moscow: Znaniye, 1974. 39 p. (In Russian)
13. Leontiev A. A. (1979). Pedagogical communication. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 1979. 1. 48 p. (In Russian)
14. Martyanova I. A. (2007). Interactive learning in the course of sociology: principles, forms and methods, pedagogical effectiveness. Almanac of modern science and education. 5 (5): 141-144. (In Russian)
15. Mullakhmetova G. N. (2024). Modern pedagogical technologies as a means of increasing students' motivation to master highly complex material. Bulletin of Tula State University. Pedagogy. 3: 64-72. (In Russian)
16. Murphy L., Eduljee N. B. & Croteau K. (2021). Teacher-centered versus student-centered teaching: preferences and differences across academic majors. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education. 4 (1): 18-39.
17. Nagornova N. I. (2009). Lecture-discussion as an effective type of educational lecture. Science and new technologies. 3: 89-91. (In Russian)
18. Oshchepkova O. V. (2014). Methodology for conducting a lecture-press conference and a lecture with planned errors. Bulletin of Samara Law Institute. Issues of professional education of employees of the penal system. 3(14): 99-102. (In Russian)
19. Salmanova D. A. (2019). Heuristic conversation as a form of organizing the pedagogical process at the university. Bulletin of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and pedagogical sciences. 13(2): 132-136. (In Russian)
20. Silva H., Lopes J., Dominguez C. & Morais E. (2022). Lecture, cooperative learning and concept mapping: Any differences on critical and creative thinking development? International Journal of Instruction. 15(1): 765-780.
21. Sinitsyna O. V. (2007). Psychological analysis of lecture as the main activity of a university teacher. Almanac of modern science and education. 1: 230-231. (In Russian)
22. Skafa E. I., Timoshenko E. V. (2024). From the experience of organizing a provocative lecture in teaching heuristic techniques to future mathematics teachers. Didactics of Mathematics: Problems and Research. 1 (61): 54-63. (In Russian)
23. Sokovykh K. A. (2019). Different types of lectures in the interactive teaching model when studying predicate types at the university. Bulletin of the Master's degree. 90 (3-2): 93-95. (In Russian)
24. Tuma F. (2021). The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 62: 231-235.
25. Turdiyeva Z. M. (2024). Some benefits and challenges of using the lecture method in any academic field, including the study of English language, literature, and history. The best intellectual researches. 32(2): 265-273.
26. Vyazankin V. S. (2025). “Soft skills” as the basis for competitiveness: definitions and approaches to classification. Bulletin of Tula State University. Pedagogy. 1: 8-17. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Zaslavskaya O.V., Fatyushina E.Yu. Lecture-discussion in the system of the forms of organizing the educational process for prospective specialists: relevance, specificity, necessary conditions. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2025;(2):165-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2025_2_165
Views:
10
JATS XML
Email this article 