Preview

Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language

Advanced search

Modus category of prediction and its interpreting potential

https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2024_2_165

Abstract

The article discusses linguistic representation of human knowledge about future events, processes, situations. The study focuses on prospective categorization of the reality. More specifically the paper considers linguistic conceptualization and categorization of forecasting as a cognitive activity. The author states that modus category of PREDICTION involves cognitive operations of interpretation, modalization, and evaluation of the conceptual content. The paper discusses discursive construal of future climate changes in English media. The findings obtained may be helpful for further study of the modal categorization as one of the forms of knowledge representation in language and its interpretative potential.

About the Author

L. V. Proskurnina
Irkutsk State University
Russian Federation

Larisa V. Proskurnina, Postgraduate student

1, Karl Marx Street, Irkutsk, 664003



References

1. Abbazova R. R., Mokeeva A. A. (2015). Monetary policy on the forecast horizon 2016-2018. Scientific almanac. 11-1(13): 20-22.

2. Arutyunova N. D. (1999). Language and the world of man. 2nd ed., rev. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, 1999. 896 p.

3. Banfield-Nwachi M. (2023). Met Office warns of thunderstorms and possible threat to life in southern UK. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/sep/17/met-office-warns-of-thunderstorms-and-possible-threat-to-life-in-southern-uk (accessed 12 November 2023).

4. Boldyrev N. N. (2019). Language and knowledge system. cognitive theory of language. 2nd edition. Moscow, 2019. 242 p.

5. CED – Collins ENGLISH Dictionary. Available at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/ (accessed 01 September 2024).

6. Devitt M., Sterelny K. (1985). Language and Reality. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language/ Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press, 1985. 253 p.

7. Dolinina I. B. (1985). Specificity of the semantics of predicates in constructions with predicate actants // Typology of constructions with predicate actants. L.: Nauka, 1985. pp. 42-46.

8. Fodor J. A. (1980). The Language of Thought. Second Printing. Cambridge (Mass.): Harv. Univ.Press, 1980. 214 p.

9. Glovinskaya M. Ya. (2003). Predict, foretell, prophesy, prophesy. School “Languages of Slavic Culture”. 2003. 825-830.

10. Ilchuk E. V. (2004). Thinking and perception through the prism of language (based on the English language): monograph. Moscow: GNO Publishing house "Prometheus" MPGU, 2004. 264 p.

11. Ilnitsky M. (2011). Predictive knowledge as a tool for understanding political reality. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University. I. Kant. 6: 84-91.

12. Kamshilova O. N. (1984). Semantic-syntactic organization of sentences with modus predicates: abstract. dis. ...cand. Philol. Sciences: 10.02.04 / O. N. Kamshilova. Leningrad, 1984. 29 p.

13. Karasik V. I. (2018). Prediction as a speech genre. Genres of speech. 1(17): 39-47.

14. Klepikova T. A. (2008). Linguistic meta-representations: Monograph. St. Petersburg: Asterion, 2008. 249 p.

15. Knyazeva A. A. (2009). Texts about predicting the future as a type of prognostic texts. News of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after. A. Herzen, 114: 200-212.

16. Kobrina O. A. (2021). Modus component of the linguistic-communicative category. Current problems of philology and linguodidactics. 50-56.

17. Kozlovsky D. V. (2022). Interaction of modal categories “evidentiality” and “modality” in mass media discourse. Philology and man. 3: 32-45.

18. Kubryakova E. S. (2004). Language and knowledge: On the way to acquiring knowledge about language: Parts of speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in understanding the world. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture, 2004. 560 p.

19. Kubryakova E. S. (2012). In search of the essence of language: Cognitive research. Moscow: Znak, 2012. 203 p.

20. Linguistic futurism. A look into the future of language. M.: Indrik, 2011. 519 p.

21. Maksimov A. N. (2008). Mode of preference and its expression in the semantic structure of words and sentences (based on the material of the English language). Bulletin of the University of the Russian Academy of Education. 2: 52-55.

22. MEDAL – Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Available at: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/ (accessed 08 January 2024).

23. Milman O. (2023). Revealed: Exxon made ‘breathtakingly’ accurate climate predictions in 1970s and 80s. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/12/exxon-climate-change-global-warming-research (accessed 29 January 2024).

24. Niranjan A. (2023). Earth on verge of five catastrophic climate tipping points, scientists warn. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/06/earth-on-verge-of-five-catastrophic-tipping-points-scientists-warn (accessed 12 November 2023).

25. Noor D. (2023). Leading Nasa climate expert says July likely to be hottest month on record. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/20/nasa-climate-crisis-july-hottest-month (accessed 12 November 2023).

26. OALD – Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English / ed. by A.S. Hornby with the ass. of A.P. Cowie. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1982. 614 p.

27. OLD – Oxford Learner’s Dictionary. Available at: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/ (accessed 29 January 2024).

28. Paducheva E. V. (2004). Dynamic models in the semantics of vocabulary. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 2004. 609 p.

29. Paul K. (2023). Floods, tornadoes, heat: more extreme weather predicted across US. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/13/more-extreme-weather-across-us (accessed 11 December 2023).

30. Piskorskaya S. Yu., Letunova O. V. (2006). The problem of probabilistic knowledge in science. Bulletin of the Siberian State Aerospace University. Academician M.F. Reshetneva. 6(13): 278-280.

31. Pivoev V. M. (2013). Probabilistic knowledge in the humanities. XXIII ERSHOV READINGS. interuniversity collection of scientific articles. 60-63.

32. Ragozina I. F. (2011). “If only…”: forecasts, plans, dreams. Linguistic futurism. A look into the future of language. 503-513.

33. Ryabtseva N. K. (2005). Language and natural intelligence. Moscow: Academia, 2005. 639 pp.

34. Savitskayte E. R. (2006). Discursive characteristics of prognostic texts (based on German horoscopes): Abstract of thesis. ...cand. Philol. Sci. Voronezh: VSU Publishing House, 2006. 24 p.

35. Seliverstova O. N. (2004). Works on semantics. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture, 2004. 960 p.

36. Semenova T. I. (2007). Linguistic phenomenon of appearance (based on the material of modern English): dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State Linguistic University, 2007. 339 p.

37. Semenova T. I. (2023). Modus categorization of erroneous actions in the English-language picture of the world. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 3: 90-102.

38. Semenova T. I., Ishenina A. S. (2021). Mode of imagination in the categorical space of the English language. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 3: 72-87.

39. Shatunovsky I. B. (1996). Semantics of sentences and non-referential words (meaning, communicative perspective, pragmatics). Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, 1996. 400 p.

40. Trushkov M. A. (2017). Study of the semantics of typicality: sources, methods, main results. Bulletin of the Vyatka State University. 11: 189-194.

41. Tupikova S. E. (2014). Modal category of tonality and linguistic methods of its implementation in journalistic discourse. News of Saratov University. New episode. Series: Philology. Journalism. 14(1): 20-25.

42. Zaliznyak A. A. (2006). Polysemy in language and ways of representing it. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures, 2006. 671 p. M.Yu.

43. Zolotova G. A., Onipenko N. K., Sidorova M. Yu. (2004). Communicative grammar of the Russian language. 2nd ed. Moscow: IRYa RAS: MSU, 2004. 544 p.


Review

For citations:


Proskurnina L.V. Modus category of prediction and its interpreting potential. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2024;(2):165-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2024_2_165

Views: 11

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2312-1327 (Online)