METHODOLOGY FOR AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT OF THE CONVERGENCING AIRCRAFT HAZARD IN THE EVENT OF SEPARATION INTERVALS VIOLATION
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2024_4_18
Abstract
The article proposes a method for automated high-precision assessment of the danger of approaching aircraft in case of violation of established separation standards on a continuous 100-point scale. The technique is a step-by-step search for the maximum hazard of approaching aircraft from the moment of the beginning of the violation of separation intervals to the end of the conflict situation. The main criterion for assessment is the linear functional dependence of the values of the minimum distances between aircraft, weighted in the established separation standards. A 100-point assessment will allow for the comparison and comparison of potential hazard between different facts of violations of separation standards, the severity of the threats and risks to flight safety contained therein.
Using "perceived hazard" as a reference points allows assessing the level of flight safety even in the absence of violations of separation intervals for the selected reporting period. The analysis of the estimates obtained using the methodology will help to take timely preventive measures to eliminate potential threats even before the occurrence of real aviation events. It is advisable to use this methodology in solving the tasks of automating the assessment of practical skills of air traffic control personnel and creating an automatic flight safety management system.
About the Authors
A. P. Plyasovskih
Saint-Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation named after Air Chief Marshal A.A. Novikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander P. Plyasovskih, Alexander P. Plyasovskih
38, street of Pilots Saint-Petersburg, 196210
A. Yu. Vinnikov
Saint-Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation named after Air Chief Marshal A.A. Novikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem Yu. Vinnikov, Graduate Student
38, street of Pilots Saint-Petersburg, 196210
V. Yu. Topilin
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Radio Equipment
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir Yu. Topilin
120, Obukhovskoy Oborony Avenue Saint-Petersburg, 192012
References
1. Beliatskaia A. P., Vorobev V. V., Eliseev B. P. (2021). Research of the Methods of Collision Avoidance of Aircraft with the Ground in Controlled Flight During Landing. XVIII Technical Scientific Conference on Aviation Dedicated to the Memory of N.E. Zhukovsky (TSCZh). 1-6.
2. Blom H. A. P., Sybert H. S., Hans H. d. J. (2006). Safety Risk Assessment by Monte Carlo Simulation of Complex Safety Critical Operations. Proceedings 14th Safety-critical Systems Symposium. Pp. 47-67.
3. Borisov V. E., Evsevichev D. A. (2018). Automation of control of the learning process in the training of air traffic controllers. Automation of control processes: collection of scientific tr. on the mater. youth. scientific and technical conf. (1): pp.13-20. (In Russian)
4. Borisov V. E. (2022). Methods of automation of simulator training of ATC dispatchers. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Technical Sciences. 155 p. (In Russian)
5. Brooker P. (2003). Lateral Collision Risk In Air Traffic Track Systems: A ‘Post-Reich’ Event Model. Journal of Navigation. 56(3): pp.399-409.
6. Costea M. L., Stroe G. L., Costache F., Semenescu A., Andrei I. C. (2022) Optimization methods for collision aircraft avoidance. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2425(1). Available at: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2425/1/240007/2823385/Optimization-methods-forcollision-aircraft?redirectedFrom=fulltext (accessed 10 August 2024).
7. Eliseev B. P., Svirkin V. A. (2017). On the issue of integrating the results of the investigation of aviation accidents and incidents into the flight safety management system. Transport Law. (1): pp. 14-18. (In Russian)
8. Flight safety analysis at the ANO in FSUE "State ATM Corporation" in 2022. Moscow: FSUE "State ATM Corporation". 2023. 46 p. (In Russian)
9. Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: Results and prospects of development / Ed. A. L. Zhuravlev, V. A. Koltsova. M.: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. 2704 p. (In Russian)
10. Kryzhanovsky G. A., Kupin V. V. (2010). Modeling of decision-making in an active air traffic service system. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation. (1): pp.53-61. (In Russian)
11. Mishin A. V. (2017). The effectiveness of aviation incident investigation and ways to improve it. Problems and the future of Russian science and technology. Materials of 52 Scientific readings in memory of K.E. Tsiolkovsky. Pp.240-243. (In Russian)
12. Netjasov F., Milan J. (2008). A review of research on risk and safety modelling in civil aviation. Journal of Air Transport Management. (14): pp.213-220.
13. Plyasovskikh A. (2020). From responding to aviation events to their prevention. Aviapanorama. (6): pp.22-30. (In Russian)
14. Plyasovskikh A. P. (2020). Criterion of aircraft collision hazard. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation. 4(29): pp.64-74. (In Russian)
15. Plyasovskikh A. P., Verkhovets M. N. (2022). On the issue of developing an automated system for monitoring air traffic safety in the airfield area. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation. 1(34): pp.46-57. (In Russian)
16. Plyasovskikh A. P., Mikhalchevsky Yu. Yu. (2024). The law of perceived danger of aviation events on the example of air traffic control. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation. 2 (43): pp.40-56. (In Russian)
17. RMG 83-2007. Recommendations on interstate standardization. The state system of ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Measurement scales. Terms and definitions (put into effect by the Order of Rostec Regulation No. 337-st dated 11/29/2007). M: Standartinform. 2008. 24 p. (In Russian)
18. Svirkin V. A. (2019). Analysis of the quality of the elements of the aviation transport system in the investigation of aviation accidents and incidents. Innovations in civil aviation. (2): pp.19-24. (In Russian)
19. Svirkin V. A. (2008). Normative legal regulation of ensuring the objectivity of the investigation of aviation accidents and incidents. Transport Law. (3): pp.21-22. (In Russian)
20. Vinnikov A. Yu., Plyasovskikh A. P., Topilin V. Yu. (2023). Automation of the assessment of the danger of a conflict situation in the investigation of aviation events. Actual problems and prospects of the development of civil aviation: proceedings of the XII International Scientific and practical Conference. dedicated to the celebration of the 100th anniversary of the national civil aviation. (2): pp. 25-34. (In Russian)
21. Williams P. R. (1992). Aircraft collision avoidance using statistical decision theory. Sensors and Sensor Systems for Guidance and Navigation II. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.138129 (accessed 12 August 2024).
22. Zhao G., Mao S., Mao Y., Zhang X., Wu Y. (2020). Risk Analysis of Lateral Collision of Military and Civil Aviation Aircraft Based on Event Model. Artificial Intelligence in China. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. (572): pp.76-86.
Review
For citations:
Plyasovskih A.P., Vinnikov A.Yu., Topilin V.Yu. METHODOLOGY FOR AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT OF THE CONVERGENCING AIRCRAFT HAZARD IN THE EVENT OF SEPARATION INTERVALS VIOLATION. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2024;(4):18-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2024_4_18
Views:
10
JATS XML
Email this article 