Functional criteria of the interdiscourse of information and psychological warfare
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2021_2_81
Abstract
The article is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the linguistic aspect of information and psychological warfare in the light of modern theories and concepts in the research of speech activity, discourse and the human cognitive system. The author’s concept focuses on the use of language as an instrument of ideological influence, mainly in the form of an interdiscourse, defined as a macro-level communicative structure that comprises polarized thematic discourses. Using semantic and structural analysis, conceptual and pragmatic analysis of speeches by US Government officials, the author establishes the typology of the interdiscourse of information and psychological warfare. The results of the linguistic analysis of the text fragments demonstrate the validity of the selected criteria and their epistemological value to study the paradigm of the systemic warfare of the collective West led by the USA with the aim of destroying the integral potential of adversaries by non-combat means
About the Author
Artyom A. Khabarov
Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 14, Bolshaya Sadovaya Street, Moscow, 123001
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
candidate of philology (PhD)
References
1. Bakhtovarshoev, A. Sh. (2017). Forecast of the possible consequences of the translation to the Latin alphabet in Kazakhstan. Journal of the Belarus State University. Sociology. № 1: 71–77. (in Russian)
2. Bartosh, A. A. (2017) Adaptive strategies of information warfare (Part 1). Bulletin of the Academy of Military Sciences. №1 (58): 55-62. (in Russian)
3. Kolmogorova, A. V., Kopnin, G.A., Skovorodnikov. A.P. (2020). Actual problems of linguistic of information-psychological warfare: a brief analytical review. Linguistics of information-psychological war: monograph. Part III. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. Fed. University: P. 10-20. (in Russian)
4. Kurdyumov, V. A. (2014). Chinese language as an ideal/existential object of linguistics. // 108th meeting of the regular theoretical seminar “Problems of rational Philosophy”. Speech theses. URL: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/news/archive_events/2014/18_03_2013_kurdumov.pdf (in Russian)
5. Kybryakova, E. S. (1996). Inference. Concise dictionary of cognitive terms / managing editor E. Kybryakova. Moscow State University. P. 33-35. (in Russian)
6. Parshakova E. D. (2012). Information wars. Kramatorsk: DSMA. 93 p. (in Russian)
7. Repko, S. I. (2012). National security. Monograph. Moscow, Academy of geopolitics. 290 p. (in Russian)
8. PMESII Research Analysis Framework – 2021. URL: https://pavilion.dinfos.edu/Template/Article/2156908/pmesii-pt-research-analysis-framework/ (in English).
9. Program, Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on a Comprehensive Review of the HHS Office of Family Planning Title X.; Butler, Adrienne Stith; Clayton, Ellen Wright. Overview of Family Planning in the United States. National Academies Press (US). – 2009. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8C%D0%B8. (in English).
10. Sokolova, A. M. (2007). Information wars in the context of globalization: social and philosophical analysis. URL: https://www.dissercat.com/content/informatsionnye-voiny-v-usloviyakh-globalizatsii-sotsialno-filosofskii-analiz (in Russian)
11. Strategy «Kazakhstan -2050». Nazarbayev А.N. Official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. – 2012. URL: http://www.akorda.kz/ru/official_documents/strategies_and_programs (in Russian).
12. The transition to the Latin alphabet is the right step that meets the national interests of the State. – 2017. URL: https:// https://www.zakon.kz/4886284-perehod-na-latinitsu-pravilnyy-shag.html (in Russian).
13. US and China publicly rebuke each other in first major talks of Biden erа. The Guardian. – 2021. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/19/us-china-talks-alaska-biden-blinken-sullivan-wang (in English).
14. U.S. National Security Strategy. NSDD № 32/ 20.5.1982 – 2009. URL: https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsdd/nsdd-32.pdf (in English).
15. ,4% of the population of Kazakhstan can speak the state language. – 2010. URL: https://www.zakon.kz/190095-v-kazakhstane-gosudarstvennym-jazykom.html (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Khabarov A.A. Functional criteria of the interdiscourse of information and psychological warfare. Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2021;(2):81-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2021_2_81
Views:
7
JATS XML
Email this article 