Method for calculating the sector structural complexity index of airspace in area control sectors based on potential conflict situations (MTCD)
https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327-2026-2-28
Abstract
The method is proposed for calculating a sector index of structural complexity of the air situation in area control center (ACC) sectors based on potential conflict situations generated by predictive conflict detection (MTCD) tools. The method uses a minimum set of MTCD attributes (type, predicted start/end times, sector affiliation of participants), aggregates events over a sliding forecast window of ΔT=20 minutes, and takes into account the varying significance of interaction geometries and the duration of the PCS presence within the window. The resulting index is determined as a weighted average of normalized horizontal and vertical components with saturation on a of 0–10 scale. Experimental testing was performed using MTCD data for three ACC sectors of the Unified Air Traffic Management Center (St. Petersburg); summary indicators and time profiles Cs(t) are presented
About the Authors
Anatoly A. TorosyanRussian Federation
Senior Lecturer, Department of Air Traffic Control
Nikolay E. Baranov
Russian Federation
Cand. of Sci. (Technology), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Flight Operations
References
1. Alam S., Abbass H. A., Lokan C. J., Ellejmi M., Kirby S. (2009). Computational red teaming to investigate failure patterns in Medium Term Conflict Detection. 8th Innovative Research Workshop and Exhibition, Proceedings (Brétigny-sur-Orge, France, December 2009). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228918671_Computational_Red_Teaming_to_Investigate_Failure_Patterns_in_Medium_Term_Conflict_Detection (accessed 20.01.2026).
2. Antulov-Fantulin B., Juricic B., Radisic T., Cetek C. (2020). Determining Air Traffic Complexity – Challenges and Future Development. Promet-Traffic&Transportation. 32(4): pp.475-485. DOI 10.7307/ptt.v32i4.3401.
3. Degtyarev O. V., Egorova V. P., et al. (2006). Air Traffic Control Simulation Complex. Proceedings of the Scientific and Technical Conference “Aviation Systems in the 21st Century”. 2. Moscow: GosNIIAS. (2). (In Russian)
4. EUROCONTROL Specification for Medium-Term Conflict Detection (MTCD): SPEC-0139, Edition 2.0. (2017). Available at: https://www.eurocontrol.int/archive_download/all/node/10494 (accessed: 03.02.2026). (In English)
5. Kulida E. L., Lebedev V. G. (2023). Methods for Solving Problems of Air Traffic Flow Planning and Regulation. Part 1: Strategic Planning of Four-Dimensional Trajectories. Control Sciences. (1): pp. 3-14. DOI 10.25728/pu.2023.1.1. (In Russian)
6. Lee K., Feron E., Pritchett A. (2009). Describing Airspace Complexity: Airspace Response to Disturbances. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 32(1): pp.210-222. DOI 10.2514/1.36308.
7. Losev S. N., Makarenko V. I., Podolskaya N. N. (2015). A Probabilistic-Geometric Method for Medium-Term Conflict Detection Between Aircraft. Mechatronics, Automation, Control. 16(4): 277-282. DOI 10.17587/mau.16. Pp.277-282. (In Russian)
8. Matskevich A. M. (2022). Decision Support Models and Algorithms and Their Use in Simulator Training of Air Traffic Control Specialists. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 25(5): pp.25-36. DOI 10.26467/2079-0619-2022-25-5-25-36. (In Russian)
9. Nguyen T. L. Ph., Neretin E. S., Nguyen N. M. (2024). Development of a Method for Identifying and Resolving Conflict Situations in Operational Planning of a Four-Dimensional Flight Trajectory. Crede Experto: Transport, Society, Education, Language. (2): pp.77–95. DOI 10.51955/2312-1327_2024_2_77. (In Russian)
10. Popov A. S. (2013). The Russian Federation Airspace Structure Analysis with the Use of ATM Research Simulation Tool. Proceedings of the 4th Council of European Aerospace Societies (CEAS) Air and Space Conference. Linkoping. Pp.569-578.
11. Popov A. S., Vishnyakova L. V., Degtyarev O. V. (2012). Air Traffic Management Simulation Complex (KIM ATM). All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Simulation Modelling of Socio-Economic Systems (VKIMSES), Proceedings. Moscow. Pp.59-67. (In Russian)
12. Popov A. S., Vishnyakova L. V., Sikachev V. Yu. (2015). Simulation Modelling of the Air Traffic Management System. Seventh All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Simulation Modelling. Theory and Practice” (IMMOD2015), Proceedings. Moscow: IPU RAN. 1: pp.23-24. (In Russian)
13. Prandini M., Putta V., Hu J. (2012). Air Traffic Complexity in Future Air Traffic Management Systems. Journal of Aerospace Operations. 1(3): 281-299. DOI: 10.3233/AOP-2012-0015.
14. Torosyan A. A., Shevchenko T. V., Tarasov D. O. (2026). Algorithmic Principles of Air Traffic Control Sectors Dynamic Capacity Calculating Based on Hybrid Fuzzy Logic. Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg State University of Civil Aviation. 1: pp.58-67. (In Russian)
15. Vishnyakova L. V., Popov A. S., Sikachev V. Yu., et al. (2021). Air Traffic Management System Simulation Complex. Polet (All-Russian Scientific and Technical Journal). (7): pp.22-37. (In Russian)
16. Wang H., Song Z., Wen R. (2018). Modeling Air Traffic Situation Complexity with a Dynamic Weighted Network Approach. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2018: 1-15. DOI 10.1155/2018/5254289.
17. Xiao M., Zhang J., Cai K., Cao X. (2016). ATCEM: A Synthetic Model for Evaluating Air Traffic Complexity. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 50(3): pp.315–325. DOI 10.1002/atr.1321.
Review
For citations:
Torosyan A.A., Baranov N.E. Method for calculating the sector structural complexity index of airspace in area control sectors based on potential conflict situations (MTCD). Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2026;13(2):28-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327-2026-2-28
JATS XML
















