Preview

Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language

Advanced search

Speech characteristics of socionic types of internet commentators via corpus analysis (on the material of the Spanish language)

https://doi.org/10.51955/23121327_2022_3_178

Abstract

This article is devoted to the description of speech characteristics of Spanish-speaking commentators’ socionic types. The focus is on the speech reactions of commentators to the news about vaccination against covid-19. The aim of the work is to evaluate the effectiveness of using corpus analysis techniques to identify the formal speech characteristics of socionic types of Internet commentators. The relevance of the research work is due to the fact that the problem of automatic attribution of a text according to the criterion of the psychotype of its author remains relevant today among specialists in the field of mathematical and computational linguistics. The novelty of the work lies in the use of corpus tools and formal metrics for the analysis of Spanish-language comments.

In the course of the work, we used such methods as contextual, stylistic, qualitative, quantitative and corpus analysis (Voyant Tools web application). The analysis made it possible to obtain interpretable data on the differences in the values ​​of three formal parameters – average words per sentence, vocabulary density, readability index - in the comments of the representatives of six socionic types found in the research corpus. In addition, specific lexical units and grammatical constructions are defined for each type.

The main research perspective is the development of an automatic tool for detecting socionic personality types in social networks, which will be of practical importance for marketers and sociologists.

About the Authors

Anastasiya  V. Kolmogorova
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Philology, Professor,
82a, Svobodny pr., Krasnoyarsk, 660018



Ekaterina V. Kurilova
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

82a, Svobodny pr., Krasnoyarsk, 660018



References

1. Augustinavichyute A. (1998). Sotsion, ili osnovy sotsioniki. Sotsionika. Vvedenie. St. Petersburg. S. 33-102. (in Russian)

2. Bal'zhirova T. ZH. (2003). Internet kak sredstvo sotsial'noi kommunikatsii v usloviyakh formiruyushchegosya v Rossii informatsionnogo obshchestva: avtoref. dis. ... kand. sotsiol. nauk: 22.00.04. Ulan-Udeh, 162 s. (in Russian)

3. Bogin G. I. (1986). Model' yazykovoi lichnosti v ee otnoshenii k raznovid-nostyam tekstov: Avtoref. dis ... d-ra filol. nauk: 10.02.19. Kalinin: KGU, 86 s. (in Russian)

4. Gulenko V. V. (1998). Yung v shkole. Sotsionika – mezhvozrastnoy pedagogike/ V. V. Gulenko, V. P. Tyshchenko. Novosibirsk, 1998. 270 s. (in Russian)

5. Gulenko V. V., Tyshchenko V. P. (2010). Sotsionika idet v shkolu. Izd-vo Cher-naya Belka, 280 s. (in Russian)

6. Litvinova T. A., Litvinova O. A., Ryzhkova E. S. [i dr.] (2015). Issledovanie vliyaniya pola i psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik avtora na kolichestvennye pa-rametry ego teksta s ispol'zovaniem programmy Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Nauchnyi dialog. 12 (48):101-109. (in Russian)

7. Lovink G. (2019). Kriticheskaya teoriya interneta. Moskva: Ad Marginem Press, 370 s. (in Russian)

8. Mlechko T. P. (2014). Differentsiatsiya podkhodov k izucheniyu tipologiche-skikh raznovidnostei yazykovoi lichnosti. Vestnik RUDN. 1: 77-86. (in Russian)

9. Picard R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. The MIT Press, 306 p.

10. Ryabinin K. V., Chuprina S. I., Belousov K. I., Permyakov S .S. (2018). Metody vizual'noi analitiki variativnosti rechevogo povedeniya pol'zovatelei sotsi-al'nykh setei v zavisimosti ot psikhologicheskikh chert lichnosti.Trudy Mezh-dunar. konf. po komp'yuternoi grafike i zreniyu «GrafikoN». 28: 167-171. (in Russian)

11. Savel'eva I.V. (2022). Neprofessional'nyy politicheskiy diskurs kak novoe kommunikativnoe yavlenie: lingvopragmaticheskiy i lingvopersonologicheskiy aspekty modelirovaniya: dis….doktora filol.nauk, 10.02.19 – Teoriya yazyka, Kemerovo. 478 s. (in Russian)

12. Sedov K. F. (2004). Diskurs i lichnost': ehvolyutsiya kommunikativnoi kom-petentsii. Moscow, 320 s. (in Russian)

13. Uvarina N. V., Pakhtusova N. A. (2020). Mekhanizmy stanovleniya setevoi identichnosti lichnosti. Fundamental'nye problemy gumanitarnykh nauk: opyt i perspektivy razvitiya issledovatel'skikh proektov RFFI. Materialy vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem / pod nauch. red. N. A. Matveevoi. Barnaul: Izd-vo AGPU. S. 479-482. (in Russian)

14. Yung. K. G. (1996). Psikhologicheskie tipy. Moscow: 715 s. (in Russian)

15. Zamilova A. V. (2013). Lingvosotsionicheskoe modelirovanie russkoi yazy-kovoi lichnosti: na materiale internet-bloga: dis. ...kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01. Kemerovo, 201 s. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Kolmogorova A. ., Kurilova E.V. Speech characteristics of socionic types of internet commentators via corpus analysis (on the material of the Spanish language). Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language. 2022;(3):178-194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51955/23121327_2022_3_178

Views: 141

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2312-1327 (Online)