Structural and functional model of the categorical system of social upbringing in the scientific substantiation

The article provides a scientific substantiation of the categorical system of social upbringing based on the structural and functional model developed by the author. The scientific substantiation assumed the designation of the place and function of the model representation in the structure of the scientific substantiation. When conducting research, the author, following V. V. Kraevsky, understood the methodology of pedagogy as “a system of knowledge about the foundations and structure of pedagogical theory, about the principles of approach and methods of obtaining knowledge that reflect pedagogical reality”. Modeling, theoretical analysis and categorical synthesis were used as the main methods. Modeling was used to develop a structural and functional model of the scientific substantiation of the categorical system of social upbringing. The starting point of the model is pedagogical reality, the practical activity of social education in the broad sense as a special sphere of social activity, as part of social reality. They found a description by highlighting the components for theoretical analysis: the field of cognitive description, the normative sphere and the practice of social upbringing. Categorical synthesis was carried out using the pedagogical categories of social upbringing. For further scientific substantiation of the categorical system of social education, a promising direction for the search for mechanisms for the transition from theory to practice, from research to design, from judgments to norms is highlighted.

1. Aksyutina Z. A. (2014). Methodological and theoretical analysis of the concept of «social upbringing». Bulletin of Omsk University. 2 (27): 146-151. (In Russian)

2. Aksyutina Z. A. (2020). Methodological components of social education: scientific and content level. Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V.I. Vernadsky. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology. 6(72). 2: 36-48. (In Russian)

3. Aksyutina Z. A. (2022). Kategorial'naya sistema social'nogo vospitaniya: konceptual'nye osnovy: monografiya (Categorical system of social upbringing: conceptual foundations: monograph). Omsk: OmGPU, 2022. 248 p. (In Russian)

4. Aliev N. I. (2003). Methodological problems of differentiation of scientific and pseudo-scientific types of substantiation. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University A.I. Herzen. 3(5): 20-25. (In Russian)

5. Goncharenko Yu. V., Beloshitsky A. V. (2022). Structural-functional model for the prevention of professional deformation of teachers of military universities. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education. 4: 32-36. (In Russian)

6. Grigoricheva I. V., Melnikova Yu. A. Designing a structural-functional model for the organization of volunteer activities in schools, universities, institutions of additional education. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology. 5(8): 40-44. (In Russian)

7. Gu Ch.-Ch., Hu J., Peng Y.-H.& Li Sh. (2012). FCBS model for functional knowledge representation in conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design. 23(8): 577-596. DOI 10.1080/09544828.2011.629318.

8. Kraevsky V. V. (1976). Sostav, funkcii i struktura nauchnogo obosnovaniya obucheniya: diss. ... d-ra ped. nauk [Composition, functions and structure of scientific substantiation of education: diss. ... Dr. ped. Sciences]. Moscow. 344 p. (In Russian)

9. Kraevsky V. V. (2003). Philosophy of education in the system of scientific knowledge. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy. 2, pp. 21-29. (In Russian)

10. Kraevsky V. V. (2010). Methodological characteristics of scientific research. Public education. 5(1398): 135-143. (In Russian)

11. Neradovskaya O. R., Skripko Z. A. (2022). Methodological foundations of modern scientific and pedagogical research: from contradictions to actual topics. Scientific and Pedagogical Review. 6(46): 206-214. DOI 10.23951/2307-6127-2022-6-206-214. (In Russian)

12. Roshchin S. P. (2010). Scientific substantiation of the main provisions of fine arts is the most important task of the methodology. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. 1(33): 236-241. (In Russian)

13. Shevchenko M. S. (2023). Analysis of the results of experimental work on the development of the linguistic personality of philology students based on an interdisciplinary approach. Scientific and Pedagogical Review. 1(47): 78-86. DOI 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-1-78-86. (In Russian)

14. Smith E. R., Calderwood P. E., Dohm F. A. & Lopez P. G. (2013). Reconceptualizing Faculty Mentoring within a Community of Practice Model. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 21(2): 175-194. DOI 10.1080/13611267.2013.813731

15. Snarey J. R. & Bell D. (2003). Distinguishing Structural and Functional Models of Human Development: A Response to "What Transits in an Identity Status Transition?". An International Journal of Theory and Research. 3(3): 221-230. DOI 10.1207/S1532706XID0303_03.

16. Tomchuk S. A. (2022). Formation of professional and pedagogical competence of the future music teacher at the university. Problems of modern pedagogical education. 77-2: 362-364. (In Russian)

17. Zagvyazinsky V. I. (2019). Methodological culture of socio-pedagogical research. Social pedagogy in Russia. Scientific and methodical journal. 4: 14-19. (In Russian)