creexpCrede Experto: транспорт, общество, образование, языкCrede Experto: transport, society, education, language2312-1327Иркутский филиал ФГБОУ ВО «МГТУ ГА»10.51955/2312-1327_2025_2_56creexp-75Research ArticleАЭРОМЕХАНИКА И ПРОЧНОСТЬAeromechanics and durabilityИсследование влияния параметров адаптивной механизации на её аэродинамические характеристикиStudy of the variable camber morphing wing parameters influence on aerodynamic performancehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9370-6402СкоробогатовС. В.SkorobogatovS. V.

Сергей Викторович Скоробогатов - кандидат технических наук 

Иркутск, 664047

Sergey V. Skorobogatov - Candidate of Technical Sciences

Irkutsk, 664047

maestro.ru@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-8996-8895БутуровД. А.ButurovD. A.

Дмитрий Александрович Бутуров - магистрант; преподаватель 

ул. Лермонтова, 83 Иркутск, 664074

Иркутск, 664047

Dmitry A. Buturov - master's student;  lecturer

83, Lermontova St. Irkutsk, 664047

Irkutsk, 664047

dimabutur345@gmail.comМосковский государственный технический университет гражданской авиации (Иркутский филиал)РоссияMoscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation (Irkutsk branch)Russian FederationИркутский национальный исследовательский технический университет; Московский государственный технический университет гражданской авиации (Иркутский филиал)РоссияIrkutsk National Research Technical University; Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation (Irkutsk branch)Russian Federation202527112025025669Copyright © Скоробогатов С.В., Бутуров Д.А., 20252025Скоробогатов С.В., Бутуров Д.А.Skorobogatov S.V., Buturov D.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ce.if-mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/75

В работе представлено исследование влияния параметров адаптивной механизации на её аэродинамические характеристики. Проведено сопоставление традиционных простых закрылков и предкрылков (отклоняемых носков) с адаптивными элементами механизации крыла. Численное моделирование проводилось на базе программного комплекса XFLR5, реализующего алгоритмы XFOIL. Анализ выполнен для широкого спектра конфигураций и условий, включая изменение положения оси вращения механизации вдоль хорды крыла, широкий диапазон углов выпуска и углов атаки. Выявлены ключевые факторы, влияющие на эффективность адаптивной механизации.

This paper presents a study of the variable camber morphing wing parameters influence on aerodynamic performance. A comparison of traditional plain flaps and slats (nose flaps) with variable camber morphing wing elements was performed. Numerical simulations were conducted using the XFLR5 software suite implementing XFOIL algorithms. The analysis was performed for a wide range of configurations and conditions, including variations in the rotation axis (hinge) position of the high-lift devices along the wing chord, and a broad range of deployment and angle-of-attack values. The key factors influencing the effectiveness of morphing high-lift devices have been identified.

аэродинамикаадаптивное крылопростой закрылокотклоняемый носокмеханизация крылаaerodynamicsmorphing wingplain flapnose flaphigh-lift devicesReferencesМетодические аспекты численного решения задач внешнего обтекания на локально-адаптивных сетках с использованием пристеночных функций / А. Л. Митин, С. В. Калашников, Е. А. Янковский [и др.] // Компьютерные исследования и моделирование. 2020. Т. 12, № 6. С. 1269-1290. DOI 10.20537/2076-7633-2020-12-6-1269-1290. EDN NPTTXM.Ahmad M., Hussain Z. L., Shah S. I. A., Shams T. A. (2021). Estimation of stability parameters for wide body aircraft using computational techniques. Applied Sciences. 11(5): 2087.Патент № 2749679 C1 Российская Федерация, МПК B64C 3/44. Реконфигурируемая упругодеформируемая панель и адаптивное крыло летательного аппарата на ее основе : № 2020141803 : заявл. 17.12.2020 : опубл. 16.06.2021 / А. В. Ивченко, Н. Г. Шаронов ; заявитель Автономная некоммерческая организация высшего образования "Университет Иннополис". EDN PFCSXE.Amelyushkin I. A., Druzhinin O. V. (2022). Adaptive wing with variable curvature profile (Patent No. 2777139 C1). Russian Federation. Application No. 2021119711, filed July 6, 2021, and issued August 1, 2022. (In Russian)Патент № 2668288 C1 Российская Федерация, МПК B32B 3/00, F16H 25/00. Ячеистая конструкция и устройство на ее основе : № 2017137637 : заявл. 27.10.2017 : опубл. 28.09.2018 / А. И. Тулаев, А. В. Ивченко ; заявитель Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "ТУЛАЕВ-ПАРК". EDN ZEBHXV.Choi Y., Yun G. J. (2022). Variable camber morphing wing mechanism using deployable scissor structure: Design, analysis and manufacturing. Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science. (2): 103-117.Патент № 2777139 C1 Российская Федерация, МПК B64C 3/48, B64C 9/08. Адаптивное крыло с профилем изменяемой кривизны : № 2021119711 : заявл. 06.07.2021 : опубл. 01.08.2022 / И. А. Амелюшкин, О. В. Дружинин. EDN SOPBJI.Dal Monte A., Castelli M. R., Benini E. (2012). A retrospective of high-lift device technology. International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering. 2012. 6(11): 2561-2566.Choi Y. Variable camber morphing wing mechanism using deployable scissor structure: Design, analysis and manufacturing / Y. Choi, G. J. Yun // Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science. 2022. № 2. pp. 103-117.Deperrois A. Theoretical Limitations and shortcomings of XFLR5 (2019). Available at: https://www.xflr5.tech/docs/Part%20IV:%20Limitations.pdf (accessed 14 March 2025).Dal Monte A. A retrospective of high-lift device technology / A. Dal Monte, M. R. Castelli, E. Benini // International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering. 2012. Vol. 6, № 11. pp. 2561-2566.Drela M. (1989). XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils. Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics: Proceedings of the Conference Notre Dame, Indiana, USA. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1989. 1-12.Deperrois A. Theoretical Limitations and shortcomings of XFLR5 // [Электронный ресурс]. – 2019. URL: https://www.xflr5.tech/docs/Part%20IV:%20Limitations.pdf (дата обращения 14.03.2025).Eastman N., Jacobs M., Pinkerton R. (1931). Tests of N.A.C.A. airfoils in the Variable-Density Wind Tunnel: Series 43 and 63. Washington: Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory, 1931. 43 p.Design, analysis and experimental testing of a morphing wing / J. M. Martinez, D. Scopelliti, C. Bil [et al.] // In 25th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference. 2017. p. 0059. DOI 10.2514/6.2017-0059.Fincham J. H., Friswell M. I. (2015). Aerodynamic optimisation of a camber morphing aerofoil. Aerospace Science and technology. 43: 245-255.Development of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap for performance adaptive aeroelastic wing / N. Nguyen, U. Kaul, S. Lebofsky, E. Ting, D. Chaparro, J. Urnes // In SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition (No. ARC-E-DAA-TN25273). 2015. DOI 10.4271/2015-01-2565.Hoffmann M. J., Reuss Ramsay R., & Gregorek G. M. (1996). Effects of grit roughness and pitch oscillations on the NACA 4415 airfoil. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), 1996. 154 p.Drela M. XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils // Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics: Proceedings of the Conference Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, 5-7. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1989. pp. 1-12. DOI 10.4271/2015-01-2565.Ivchenko A. V., Sharonov N. G. (2021). Reconfigurable elastic-deformable panel and adaptive aircraft wing based on it (Patent No. 2749679 C1). Russian Federation. Application No. 2020141803, filed December 17, 2020, and issued June 16, 2021. Applicant: Autonomous Non-profit Organization of Higher Education "Innopolis University". (In Russian)Eastman N. Tests of N.A.C.A. airfoils in the Variable-Density Wind Tunnel: Series 43 and 63 / N. J. Eastman, M. R. Pinkerton. Washington: Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory, 1931. 43 p.Joseph Daniel S. (2020). Performance Analysis of Asymmetrical airfoil for Subsonic flight using XFLR5 software. The International Journal of Progressive Research in Science and Engineering. 1(8): 8-11.Estimation of stability parameters for wide body aircraft using computational techniques / M. Ahmad, Z. L. Hussain, S. I. A. Shah, T. A. Shams // Applied Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11, № 5. P. 2087. DOI 10.3390/app11052087. EDN JZZMSE.Körpe D. S. (2014). Aerodynamic modelling and optimization of morphing wings: dissertation for the degree of doctor of philosophy in the field of aerospace engineering. 2014. 117 p.Fincham J. H. Aerodynamic optimisation of a camber morphing aerofoil / J. H. Fincham, M. I. Friswell // Aerospace Science and technology. 2015. № 43. Pp. 245-255.Majid T., Jo B. W. (2021). Comparative aerodynamic performance analysis of camber morphing and conventional airfoils. Applied Sciences (Switzerland): 11(22). 10663.Hoffmann M. J. Effects of grit roughness and pitch oscillations on the NACA 4415 airfoil / M. J. Hoffmann, R. Reuss Ramsay, G. M. Gregorek. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), 1996. 154 p. DOI 10.2172/266691Marten D., Pechlivanoglou G., Nayeri C.N., Paschereit C. O. (2010). Integration of a WT Blade Design tool in XFOIL/XFLR5. In 10th German Wind Energy Conference (DEWEK 2010). Bremen, Germany, 2010. 17-18.Integration of a WT Blade Design tool in XFOIL/XFLR5 / D. Marten, G. Pechlivanoglou, C. N. Nayeri, C. O. Paschereit // In 10th German Wind Energy Conference (DEWEK 2010). Bremen, Germany, 2010. pp. 17-18.Martinez J. M., Scopelliti D., Bil C., Carrese R., Marzocca P., Cestino E., Frulla G. (2017). Design, analysis and experimental testing of a morphing wing. In 25th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference. p. 0059.Joseph Daniel S. Performance Analysis of Asymmetrical airfoil for Subsonic flight using XFLR5 software // The International Journal of Progressive Research in Science and Engineering. 2020. № 1(8). Pp. 8-11.Mitin A. L., Kalashnikov S. V., Yankovsky E. A. [et al.] (2020). Methodological Aspects of Numerical Solution of External Flow Problems on Locally Adaptive Grids Using Wall Functions. Computer Research and Modeling. 12(6): 1269-1290. DOI 10.20537/2076-7633-2020-12-6-1269-1290. (In Russian)Körpe D. S. Aerodynamic modelling and optimization of morphing wings: dissertation for the degree of doctor of philosophy in the field of aerospace engineering. 2014. 117 p. DOI 10.13140/2.1.3990.9449Moran J. (1984). An Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1984. 484 p.Majid T. Comparative Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Camber Morphing and Conventional Airfoils / T. Majid, B. W. Jo // Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 11, № 22. P. 10663. DOI 10.3390/app112210663. EDN ITMMPI.Nguyen N., Kaul U., Lebofsky S., Ting E., Chaparro D., Urnes J. (2015). Development of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap for performance adaptive aeroelastic wing. In SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition (No. ARC-E-DAA-TN25273).Moran J. An Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1984. 484 p.Tulaev A. I., Ivchenko A. V. (2018). Cellular structure and device based on it (Patent No. 2668288 C1). Russian Federation. Application No. 2017137637, filed October 27, 2017, and issued September 28, 2018. Applicant: TULAEV-PARK Limited Liability Company. (In Russian)Woods B. K. Aerodynamic modelling of the fish bone active camber morphing concept / B. K. Woods, J. H. Fincham, M. I. Friswell // In Proceedings of the RAeS Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Bristol, UK, 2014. Vol. 2224.Woods B. K., Fincham J. H., Friswell M. I. (2014). Aerodynamic modelling of the fish bone active camber morphing concept. In Proceedings of the RAeS Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Bristol, UK. 2224.Zaini H. A review of morphing wing / H. Zaini, N. I Ismail // In International Conference in Mechanical Engineering Colloquium. Liverpool, England, 2016.Zaini H., Ismail N. I. (2016). A review of morphing wing. In International Conference in Mechanical Engineering Colloquium. Liverpool, England.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.