<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">creexp</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Crede Experto: транспорт, общество, образование, язык</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Crede Experto: transport, society, education, language</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2312-1327</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Иркутский филиал ФГБОУ ВО «МГТУ ГА»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51955/2312-1327_2023_1_166</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">creexp-67</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИСКУРС, ДИСКУРСИВНЫЕ ПРАКТИКИ И ТЕКСТ: ВЕКТОРЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Опыт метадискурсивного анализа новогодних обращений Президента России</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>METADISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF NEW YEAR’S ADDRESSES OF THE RUSSIAN PRESIDENT</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9738-8122</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Богинская</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Boginskaya</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Ольга Александровна Богинская, доктор филологических наук, профессор </p><p>ул. Лермонтова, 83 Иркутск, 664074</p><p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga A. Boginskaya, Doctor of Philology, professor</p><p>83 Lermontov street Irkutsk, 664074</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">olgaa_boginskaya@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Иркутский национальный исследовательский технический университет<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Irkutsk National Research Technical University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>166</fpage><lpage>181</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Богинская О.В., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Богинская О.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Boginskaya O.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ce.if-mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/67">https://ce.if-mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/67</self-uri><abstract><p>Политический дискурс является не только информационной средой, но и интерактивным пространством взаимодействия, что обуславливает потребность изучения метадискурса как эффективной риторической стратегии. Цель работы заключается в выявлении способов актуализации метадискурса в новогоднем обращении президента как жанровом образовании политического дискурса. Для достижения данной цели выявляются категории метадискурсивных средств, используемые российским президентом и определяются их коммуникативные функции; определяется частотность метадискурсивных средств в рамках выявленных категорий. В качестве материала исследования были использованы новогодние обращения, размещенные на официальном сайте Президента России. Методологической основой послужила таксономия метадискурсивных маркеров, предложенная К. Хайлендом. В ходе исследования выявлены пять категорий метадискурсивных средств (бустеры, хеджи, маркеры отношения, самореференции и взаимодействия), используемых В. Путиным в новогодних обращениях. В дискурсивном пространстве новогоднего обращения данные метадискурсивные средства реализуют следующие коммуникативные функции: экспликация уверенности в истинности пропозиции, демонстрация солидарности с аудиторией, снижение категоричности, экспликация аффективного состояния, вовлечение адресата в диалог, принятие личной ответственности за продуцируемые высказывания. Преобладание бустеров и маркеров отношения, которые способствуют увеличению иллокутивной силы, демонстрируя уверенность адресанта в истинности выдвигаемых положений, и эксплицируют аффективное состояние говорящего, свидетельствует о коммуникативной интенции Путина сконструировать имидж уверенного в себе лидера и установить эмоциональную связь с аудиторией. Полученные результаты указывают на необходимость исследования метадискурсивных категорий как важнейших элементов политической коммуникации. Перспективными представляются межкультурные, интракультурные исследования метадискурсивных стратегий в новогодних обращениях президентов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Political discourse is not only an information environment, but also an interactive space which necessitates the study of metadiscourse as an effective rhetorical strategy. The purpose is to study metadiscourse categories in the genre of the President's New Year's address as one of the genres of political discourse. To achieve this goal, the metadiscourse categories used by the Russian president are identified and their communicative functions are determined; the frequency of markers within the metadiscourse categories is determined. New Year's addresses posted on the official website of the President of Russia were used as research materials. The taxonomy of metadiscourse markers proposed by K. Hyland was adopted as the methodological basis. The study identified five types of metadiscourse markers (boosters, hedges, attitude markers, self-mentions and engagement markers) used by the President in order to construct an effective dialogue with an audience. In the discursive space of the New Year's address, these metadiscourse markers serve the following communicative functions: showing confidence in the truth of a proposition, manifesting solidarity with an audience, mitigating categoricalness, showing emotions, engaging the addressee in a dialogue, accepting personal responsibility for the utterances produced. The predominance of boosters and attitude markers that increase the illocutionary force, demonstrating the addresser's confidence in the truth of the propositions, and explicating the speaker's affective stance, indicate Putin’s desire to construct an image of a self-confident leader and establish an emotional connection with the audience. The results obtained indicate the need to study metadiscourse categories as crucial elements of political communication. Intercultural, intracultural or diachronic studies of metadiscourse in the New Year’s addresses of the presidents seem promising.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>новогоднее обращение президента</kwd><kwd>политический дискурс</kwd><kwd>метадискурс</kwd><kwd>метадискурсивные маркеры</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>President’s New Year's address</kwd><kwd>political discourse</kwd><kwd>metadiscourse</kwd><kwd>hedging</kwd><kwd>boosting</kwd><kwd>self-reference</kwd><kwd>attitude marker</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Балашова Л.В. Жанр обращения Президента России к ее гражданам в период первой волны пандемии КОВИД-19 в зеркале концептуальной метафоры // Жанры речи. 2022. № 17-2(34). с. 115-132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balashova L.V. (2022). The genre of the Russian Federation’s President’s address to its citizens during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the mirror of a conceptual metaphor. Zhanry rechi. 17-2(34): 115-132 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Буцык Е.Д. Конструирование гендерной идентичности в политическом дискурсе // Вестник МГИМО. 2015. №2(42). С. 167-172.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bartashova O., Polyakova S. (2018). Manipulating the Mechanism of Epistemic Vigilance in Political and Legal Discourses. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences. 5(11): 707-715.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гриценко Е.С. Женщины и женственность в американском предвыборном дискурсе // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 19. Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация. 2009. № 3. С. 112-123.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beauvais p. (1989). A speech-act theory of metadiscourse. Written Communication. 6(1): 11-30. Biria R., Mohammadi A. (2012). The socio-pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics. 44(10): 1290-1302.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Демьянков В.З. Политический дискурс как предмет политологической филологии // Политическая наука. Политический дискурс: История и современные исследования. 2002. № 3. с. 31-44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Butsyk E.D. (2015). Construction of gender identity in political discourse. Vestnik MGIMO. 2 (42): 167-172. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колегаева А.В., Бедь М. Функционирование речевого жанра "поздравление" в политическом дискурсе // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2008. № 2(34). с. 140-143.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chaemsaithong K. (2017). Evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements. Folia Linguistica. 51(1): 103-132.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мингалева О.В. Воздействие посредством метафоры в политическом дискурсе // Теория языка и межкультурная коммуникация. 2018. № 1(28). с. 82-87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Charteris-Black J. (2014). Analysing political speeches. Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor.17(3): 447-449.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Романова Т.В. Фрейм-структура как инструмент анализа тональности политического дискурса (на примере политического дискурса нижегородского региона) // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2015. № 23. с. 513-519.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chilton p. (2017). Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage et société. 160-161(2-3): 237249.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сальникова И.М. Речевое воздействие в англоязычном политическом медиа-дискурсе (на примере спортивного концепта лузер) // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2011. № 11. с. 126-128.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crismore A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang, 1989. 282 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сафонова А.А. Векторы адаптации политических текстов к условиям функционирования (на материале Посланий Президента // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2: Языкознание. 2009. № 2(10). с. 83-87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dafouz-Milne E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: a cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse // Journal of Pragmatics. 40(1): 95–113.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фролова О.Е. Послание президента Федеральному собранию: жанр, содержание и средства выражения // Русская речь. 2020. № 6. с. 67–81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Demyankov V.Z. (2002). Political discourse as a subject of political linguistics. Political science. 3: 31-44. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цыбина Н.А. Гендерный аспект политического дискурса // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. 2019. № 1 (423). С. 145-150.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frolova O.E. (2020). Message of the President to the Federal Assembly: genre, content and means of expression. Russian speech. 6: 67–81 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bartashova O., Polyakova S. Manipulating the Mechanism of Epistemic Vigilance in Political and Legal Discourses // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities &amp; Social Sciences. 2018. № 5(11). p. 707-715.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fu X. (2012). The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings. Discourse Studies. 14(4): 399–417.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beauvais p. A speech-act theory of metadiscourse // Written Communication. 1989. № 6(1). p. 11-30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fuertes-Olivera P.-A. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics. 33: 1291–1307.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Biria R., Mohammadi A. The socio-pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach // Journal of Pragmatics. 2012. № 44(10). p. 1290-1302.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gritsenko E.S. (2009). Women and Femininity in American Electoral Discourse. Vestnik of Moscow university. Linguistics and intercultural communication. 3: 112-123. (in Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chaemsaithong K. Evaluative stancetaking in courtroom opening statements // Folia Linguistica. 2017. № 51(1). p. 103-132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Horváth J. (2011). Critical discourse analysis of Obama's political discourse [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/39586848/.html (accessed 10.11.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Charteris-Black J. Analysing political speeches // Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. 2014. № 17(3). p. 447-449.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hyland K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, UK: Continuum, 2005. 230 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chilton p. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump // Langage et société. 2017. № 160-161(2-3). p. 237-249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashiha H. (2002). On persuasive strategies: metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction. 15(1): 77-100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crismore A. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang, 1989. 282 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolegaeva A.V., Bed M. (2008). Functioning of the speech genre "congratulation" in political discourse. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2(34): 140-143 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dafouz-Milne E. The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: a cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse // Journal of Pragmatics. 2008. № 40(1). p. 95–113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mai H. (2016). An intercultural analysis of meta-discourse markers as persuasive power in Chinese and American political speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2016. 4(6): 207–219.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fu X. The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings // Discourse Studies. 2012. № 14(4). p. 399–417.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazzi D. (2010). “This argument fails for two reasons …”: A linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US supreme court judgments. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 23: 373–385.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fuertes-Olivera P.-A. Persuasion and advertising English: metadiscourse in slogans and headlines // Journal of Pragmatics. 2001. № 33. p. 1291–1307.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mingaleva O.V. (2018). The impact through a metaphor in political discourse. Theory of language and intercultural communication. 1(28): 82-87 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Horváth J. Critical discourse analysis of Obama's political discourse. 2011. [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/39586848/.html (accessed 10.11.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirzaeian E. (2020). An Intra-cultural Analysis of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers Used in Obama and Trump’s Speeches on the Iran Nuclear Deal. Corpus Pragmatics. 4: 191-205.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hyland K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, UK: Continuum, 2005. 230 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miššíková G. (2007). Maxim hedges in political discourse: A contrastive perspective. Topics in Linguistics. 1: 145-152.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kashiha H. On persuasive strategies: metadiscourse practices in political speeches // Discourse and Interaction. 2002. № 15 (1). p. 77-100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rezaei S., Nourali N. (2016). Language and power: The use of persuasive techniques in Iran and hes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 7(6): 1203-1209.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mai H. An intercultural analysis of meta-discourse markers as persuasive power in Chinese and American political speeches // International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2016. № 4(6). p. 207–219.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romanova T.V. (2015). Frame structure as a tool for analyzing the tone of political discourse (on the example of political discourse in Nizhny Novgorod region). Cognitive studies of language. 23: 513-519 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mazzi D. “This argument fails for two reasons …”: A linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US supreme court judgments // International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 2010. № 23. p. 373–385.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Russell A. (2011). The Arab spring extra-national information flows, social media and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. International Journal of Communication. 5: 1238–1247.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mirzaeian E. An Intra-cultural Analysis of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers Used in Obama and Trump’s Speeches on the Iran Nuclear Deal // Corpus Pragmatics. 2020. № 4. p. 191-205.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Safonova A. (2009). Vectors of adaptation of political texts (based on the presidential addresses). Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2(10): 83-87 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miššíková G. Maxim hedges in political discourse: A contrastive perspective // Topics in Linguistics. 2007. № 1. 145-152.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salnikova I.M. (2011). Speech influence in the English-language political media discourse (on the example of the sports concept loser). Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 11: 126-128. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rezaei S., Nourali N. Language and power: The use of persuasive techniques in Iran and U.S. president speeches // Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2016. № 7(6). p. 1203-1209. Russell A. The Arab spring extra-national information flows, social media and the 2011 Egyptian uprising // International Journal of Communication. 2011. № 5. p. 1238–1247.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukma B.P. (2012). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign speeches. Kompleks Indonesia Peace and Security Center. 2017. 29(2): 283–292.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sukma B.P. Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign speeches // Kompleks Indonesia Peace and Security Center. 2017. № 29(2). p. 283–292.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Takimoto M. (2015). A Corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 5(1): 95–105.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Takimoto M. A Corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles // Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2015. № 5(1). p. 95–105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsybina N.A. (2019). Gender aspect of political discourse. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 1(423): 145-150.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vande Kopple W. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse // College Composition and Communication. 1985. № 36(1). p. 82-93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vande Kopple W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication. 1985. 36(1): 82-93.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zou H., Hyland K. Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs // Discourse Studies. 2019. № 21(6). p. 713-733.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zou H., Hyland K. (2019). Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs. Discourse Studies. 21(6): 713-733.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zou H., Hyland K. “Think about how fascinating this is”: Engagement in academic blogs across disciplines // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2020. № 43. p. 100809.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zou H., Hyland K. (2020). “Think about how fascinating this is”: Engagement in academic blogs across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 43: 100809.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
