creexpCrede Experto: транспорт, общество, образование, языкCrede Experto: transport, society, education, language2312-1327Иркутский филиал ФГБОУ ВО «МГТУ ГА»10.51955/23121327_2022_2_91creexp-222Research ArticleДИСКУРС, ДИСКУРСИВНЫЕ ПРАКТИКИ И ТЕКСТ: ВЕКТОРЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯАргументативное пространство педагогического нормативного дискурса (на материале немецкого языка)Argumentative space of the pedagogical normative discourse (based on German)https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-2402БольшаковаТатьяна МихайловнаBolshakovaTatyana M.

кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры немецкой филологии

набережная реки Мойки, д. 48, 191186, Санкт-Петербург, Россия

Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor

Moika Emb., 48, 191186, Saint Petersburg

tmbolshakova@herzen.spb.ruРоссийский государственный педагогический университет им. А.И. Герцена,РоссияThe Herzen State Pedagogical University of RussiaRussian Federation2022280220260291108Copyright © Большакова Т.М., 20262026Большакова Т.М.Bolshakova T.M.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ce.if-mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/222

Статья посвящена исследованию аргументативного пространства педагогического нормативного дискурса, представленного различными типами текстов, которые содержат правила поведения, предназначенные для учащихся немецких начальных школ. В работе рассмотрена структура аргументативного пространства, выявлены типы контекстуальных аргументов и проведена их классификация. На основе изучения состава аргументативных конструкций определены типы логических отношений между тезисами и аргументами, описана роль аргументативных конструкций в структуре текста на макро- и микроуровнях. На основании анализа эмпирического материала сделан вывод о том, что нормативный текст обладает аргументативным потенциалом, но аргументативное и нормативное пространства текстов обнаруживают определённую автономность и сосуществуют параллельно. Прагматическая структура аргументативного пространства актуализуется и накладывается на прагматическую структуру нормативного пространства в случае осуществления процедуры аргументирования. Анализ текстового массива показал также, что широкое использование различных типов контекстуальных аргументов и способов их вербального воплощения аргументирования в большинстве отобранных текстовых единиц свидетельствует о системном характере аргументирования как средства убеждающего воздействия на школьников, которые должны декодировать и усваивать нормативные высказывания. Новизна исследования заключается в привлечении нормативных текстов в качестве объекта изучения аргументативности и описании закономерностей, определяющих особенности построения аргументативного пространства в педагогическом дискурсе

The article is devoted to the study of the argumentative space of the pedagogical normative discourse, represented by various types of texts that contain rules of conduct intended for students of German primary schools. The paper considers the structure of the argumentative space, identifies the types of contextual arguments and carries out their classification. Based on the study of the composition of argumentative constructions, the types of logical relations between theses and arguments are determined, the role of argumentative constructions in the structure of the text at the macro and micro levels is described. Based on the analysis of empirical material, it is concluded that the normative text has an argumentative potential, but the argumentative and normative spaces of texts reveal a certain autonomy and coexist in parallel. The pragmatic structure of the argumentative space is actualized and superimposed on the pragmatic structure of the normative space in the case of the argumentation procedure. The analysis of the text array also showed that the widespread use of various types of contextual arguments and ways of their verbal embodiment of argumentation in most selected text units indicates the systematic nature of argumentation as a means of convincing influence on schoolchildren, who must decode and assimilate normative statements. The novelty of the study lies in the involvement of normative texts as an object of study of argumentation and the definition of patterns that determine the features of the construction of an argumentative space in pedagogical discourse

аргументацияаргументативное пространствоконтекстуальный аргументаргументатораудиторияпедагогический дискурснормативный дискурсargumentationargumentative spacecontextual argumentarguerrecipientpedagogical discoursenormative discourseReferencesBelov S. A. (2015). Is rational discourse able to justify value choice in law? Law.5 (316): 224-236. (In Russian)Miteinander lernen [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.grundschule-im-eliashof.de/schule/unsere-schulregeln/ (accessed: 06.02.2022)Berg J. (1987). Interpreting Arguments. Informal Logic. Vol. 9. 1: 13-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v9i1.2655.Regeln für ein angenehmes Miteinander [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.grundschule-heldenfingen.de/unsere-schule/schulregeln.html (accessed: 10.02.2022)Besnard Ph., Garcia A., Hunter A., Modgil S., Prakken H., Simary G., Toni F. (2014). Introduction to Structured Argumentation. Argument & Computation. Vol. 5. 1: 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2013.869764.Schulordnung/ Grundschule am Roggenkamp [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.gsamro.de/schulordnung (accessed: 10.01.2022)Bolshakova Т. М. (2019).Quasi-egocentrism as a technique of communicative-speech arrangement of normative text (be the example of normative texts of the German primary schools). Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Praxis. Vol. 12. 1: 226-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.12.44 (In Russian)Schulordnung/ Grundschule Gresse [Electronic resource] – URL: http://www.grundschule-gresse.de/schulordnung.html (accessed: 20.01.2022)Burke Sh., Diba P., Antonopoulos G. A. (2020). ‘You sick, twisted messes’: The use of argument and reasoning in Islamophobic and anti-Semitic discussions on Facebook. Discourse & Society. Vol.31 (4): 374-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520903527.Schulordnung/ Grundschule Wohlfskehlen [Electronic resource] – URL: http://grundschule-wolfskehlen.de/data/documents/Schulordnung-ab-September-2017.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022)Casey J. (2020). Adversariality and Argumentation. Informal Logic. Vol.40. 1: 77-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v40i1.5969.Schulordnung/ Hermann-Löns-Schule [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.hermann-loens-schule-lueneburg.de/schulordnung.html (accessed: 10.01.2022)Chittleborough P., Newman M. E. (1993). Defining the Term “Argument”. Informal Logic. 1993. Vol.15. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v15i3.2486.Schulordnung/ Rosa-Parks-Grundschule [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.rosa-parks-schule.de/unsere-schule/schulordnung (accessed: 20.01.2022)Dudnik L. V. (2013). Argumentation in business speech. University Bulletin. 2: 251-255. (In Russian)Schulordnung der Comenius-Schule [Electronic resource] – URL: http://www.grundschule-berne.de/index.php/unsere-schule-2/schulordnung (accessed: 20.01.2022)Feteris E. T. (2008). Models for the Analyses of Legal Argumentation. Informal Logic. Vol. 28. 1: 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i1.509.Schulordnung der Grundschule Gadeland [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.grundschule-gadeland.de/index.php/schule-allgemein/schulordnung (accessed: 22.01.2022)Guilfoyle L., Hillier J., Fancourt N. (2021). Students’ argumentation in the contexts of science, religious education, and interdisciplinary science-religious education scenarios. Research in Science & Technological Education – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1947223.Schulordnung der Rothenburg-Grundschule [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.rothenburg-grundschule.de/unser-weg/schulordnung.html (accessed: 20.01.2022)Gusev S. S. (2016). Types of argumentation in science. Human. Culture. Education.1 (19): 42-48. (In Russian)Schulregeln [Electronic resource] – URL: http://www.gs-karbach.de/seite/de/grundschule/033:217/msr_tn_33/Schulregeln.html (accessed: 06.02.2022)Ivin А. А. (2015). From shadow to light flying… Essays on Contemporary Philosophy. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. 592 p. (In Russian)Schulregeln/ Grundschule Buscher Holzweg [Electronic resource] – URL: http://www.ggs-bhw.de/schulregeln.html (accessed: 06.02.2022)Ivin А. А. (2021). The logic of assessments and norms. Philosophical, methodological and applied aspects: monography. Moscow: Prospect. 320 p. (In Russian)Schulregeln der Grundschule Herberhausen [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.grundschule-herberhausen.de/schulregeln/ (accessed: 20.01.2022)Ivlev Ju. V. (2015). Means of persuasion. Philosophy and society.3- 4 (77): 144-154. (In Russian)Schulregeln der Grundschule Hogenkamp [Electronic resource] – URL: https://grundschule-hogenkamp.de/unsere-schule/schulregeln/ (accessed: 12.02.2022)Jakaza E. (2019).Sensationalism in argumentation: A case of the Zimbabwean parliament debates. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus. Vol. 58: 293-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5842/58-0-848.Schulregeln der Heinrich-Kielhorn-Grundschule [Electronic resource] – URL: https://gsvallstedt.de/Schulregeln.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022)Kachesova I. Ju. (2009). Structure of argumentative discourse: to the formulation of the problem. Philology and Human. 2 [Electronic resource] – https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/struktura-argumentativnogo-diskursa-k-postanovke-problemy (accessed: 07.02.2022). (In Russian)Schul- und Hausordnung [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.ohs-ruesselsheim.de/Downloads/ (accessed: 20.01.2022)Kuhn D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science Education. Vol.94. Issue 5. September 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395.Unsere Schulordnung/ Grundschule Seckmauern [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.grundschule-seckmauern.de/unsere-schulen/schulordnung/seckmauern/ (accessed: 20.01.2022)Leal F. (2021). Argumentation Ab Homine in Philosophy. Informal Logic. Vol.41. 2: 219-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i2.6338.Unsere Schulordnung/ Grundschule Winsen [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.gs-winsen.de/schulregeln.html (accessed: 29.12.2021)Macpherson A. C. (2016). A Comparison of Scientists’ Arguments and School Argumentation Tasks. Science Education. Vol. 100. Issue 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21246Unsere Schulordnung/ Schule Adorf/V. [Electronic resource] – URL: http://www.grundschuleadorf.de/Schulordnung/ (accessed: 20.01.2022)Martirosyan E. G., Pozdeeva Т. V. (2015). Argumentative discourse in political newspaper communication. Bulletin of AGU. 2 (153): 67-72. (In Russian)Unsere Schulregeln [Electronic resource] – URL: https://www.gs-vehrte.de/schulregeln/ (accessed: 20.01.2022)Oschepkova N. A. (2015). Kontextual Argument vs Universal Argument. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 11: 98-101. (In Russian)Oschepkova N. A. (2015). Kontextual Argument vs Universal Argument. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 11: 98-101. (In Russian)Remizov P. V. (2009). Critique as a form of legal argumentation. Philosophy of Law. 3: 81-86. (In Russian)Remizov P. V. (2009). Critique as a form of legal argumentation. Philosophy of Law. 3: 81-86. (In Russian)Savtchouk T. N. (2016). Argumentative Models in the Scientific Humanitarian Discourse: Experience of Reconstruction. Vesnik BDU. Ser. 4, Filalogija. Zhurnalistyka. Pedagogika. 1: 32-38. (In Russian)Savtchouk T. N. (2016). Argumentative Models in the Scientific Humanitarian Discourse: Experience of Reconstruction. Vesnik BDU. Ser. 4, Filalogija. Zhurnalistyka. Pedagogika. 1: 32-38. (In Russian)Sitnikova I. O. (2002).On the influence of the philosophy of language of M. Heidegger on his methods of argumentations. Bulletin of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. 2 (28): 34-41. (In Russian)Sitnikova I. O. (2002).On the influence of the philosophy of language of M. Heidegger on his methods of argumentations. Bulletin of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. 2 (28): 34-41. (In Russian)Stepanov V. N., Boldyreva Е. М. (2012). Argumentation as a way of speech influence in the advertising text of modern mass culture. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2. Volume 1 (Humanities): 182-187. (In Russian)Stepanov V. N., Boldyreva Е. М. (2012). Argumentation as a way of speech influence in the advertising text of modern mass culture. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2. Volume 1 (Humanities): 182-187. (In Russian)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.